Our website uses cookies to store information on your computer. You may delete and block all cookies from this site, but parts of the site will not work as a result. Find out more about how we use cookies.
(Accept cookies and do not show this message again)
Shout99 - News matters for freelancers
Search Shout99 - News matters for freelancers
(Advanced Search)
   Join Shout99  About Shout99   Sitemap   Contact Shout99 16th Apr 2024
Forgot your password?
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
New Users Click Here
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
Front Page
News...
Freelancers' Shop...
Ask an Expert...
Letters
Direct Contracts
Press Links
Question Time
The Clubhouse
Conference Hall...
News from Partners
Accountants

Login
Sitemap

Business Links

Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660

Freelancers' Shop

Personal Financial Services
from ContractorFinancials

Mortgages

Pensions

ISAs

Income protection

... and more special offers for Shout99 readers in the Freelancers' Shop

Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
  
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660

News for the
Construction Industry

Hardhatter.com - News for small businesses in the construction industry

Powered by
Powered by Novacaster
Advertisement
Shout99 Jobs

Restriction of Trade
by ability at 09:28 18/10/13 (Letters from Freelancers)
In response to the Ask-Legal-Accounting post by AJP1966 at 12:04 17/10/13 (Ask-Legal-Accounting)

"The agent has included a clause that says that I cannot take a contract with another division of the client within 6 months of the ending of this contract.

I think this is a restriction of trade and as such should be removed from the contract.

The agent is saying I am wrong. They also refuse point blank to change any of the contract"

Is the restriction that you cannot take a contract with another division at all within 6 months, or that you cannot take a contract through another agency?

I have never seen the former and cannot see the point of it.

I have seen the latter many times, as a means of the agency protecting itself from doing the upfront work of introducing you to the client & then you moving to another agency. I am not sure whether it is actually enforceable, but it has never been an issue for me.

I had one situation where I was about to work for a satellite subsidary of a large European Aersospace and Defence Company and there was initially such a clause. When I pointed out how wide ranging & restrictive this would be, the agent agreed to reduce its range.

--
ability

View Comments (Flat Mode) Printer Version

Mail this to a friend
Restriction of Trade ability - 18/10
    Re: Restriction of Trade brianc - 20/10
       Re: Restriction of Trade ability - 20/10
       Re: Restriction of Trade brianc - 21/10
          Re: Restriction of Trade ability - 21/10
             Re: Restriction of Trade brianc - 21/10

Copyright 1999-2018, Shout99.com | All Rights Reserved
Privacy Notice and Terms of Use
 

Advertisements
advert
advert
advert
advert