Our website uses cookies to store information on your computer. You may delete and block all cookies from this site, but parts of the site will not work as a result. Find out more about how we use cookies.
(Accept cookies and do not show this message again)
Shout99 - News matters for freelancers
Search Shout99 - News matters for freelancers
(Advanced Search)
   Join Shout99  About Shout99   Sitemap   Contact Shout99 23rd Jul 2024
Forgot your password?
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
New Users Click Here
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
Front Page
Freelancers' Shop...
Ask an Expert...
Direct Contracts
Press Links
Question Time
The Clubhouse
Conference Hall...
News from Partners


Business Links

Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660

Freelancers' Shop

Personal Financial Services
from ContractorFinancials




Income protection

... and more special offers for Shout99 readers in the Freelancers' Shop

Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660

News for the
Construction Industry

Hardhatter.com - News for small businesses in the construction industry

Powered by
Powered by Novacaster
Shout99 Jobs

IR35 II and SDC
by ThePower at 14:29 03/12/15 (Letters from Freelancers)
Why do HMRC think they can base IR35 II on SDC only - when they couldn't originally?
I'm sure I'll be rehearsing old arguments here but I'm wondering how a new IR35 base entirely on Supervision, Direction and/or Control can possibly work.

Firstly let me get this right. There is no legal definition of a Personal Service Company. There never has been and there probably never can be.

Secondly, in the absence of this formal definition, IR35 can apply to anyone who owns at least 5% of a company and supplies "Personal Service" via that company.

Now, under the current IR35, the determination of so-called "Disguised Employment" relies on both the working practices within a project and the commercial relationship between the intermediary and the client. Thus, however much Supervision, Direction and Control there is between the end client and the individual performing services, certain commercial considerations e.g. Right of Substitution, Fixed Price Deliverables, Mutuality of Obligation can nullify these factors.

Imagine now a consultancy equally owned by 10 practitioners. They advertise for contracts (maybe even employing a salesman to develop business), refuse to name individual consultants on their contracts and have a Substitution clause in every one of them.

They charge out consultants at a daily rate (negotiated by the salesman or consultancy manager) but pay them a fixed salary (maybe with bonuses depending on the value of work done or maybe not). The company can retain and invest profits with the owners paying tax and NI only on the money they earn. The company may or may not pay dividends. IR35 does not apply due to the commercial nature of all arrangements and the company being clearly "In Business on its Own Account".

Now imagine the new world. Since IR35 II is based entirely on Supervision, Direction and (or worse, "or") Control, a fair proportion, if not all, of the consulting work done may be caught. This means that an individual who does work for a third party may be due to pay Income Tax and NI not on salary actually paid but on the fees the consultancy earns! If one's effective salary is, say, 50% of the charge-out rate (surely not unfeasible in a growing consultancy) one could be taxed on twice one's salary! Meanwhile, office-based staff who do not do any consulting will only be taxed on their actual salaries.

Surely this is ridiculous, is not what is intended by the legislation and the very reason it was not used in the original IR35!


View Comments (Flat Mode) Printer Version

Mail this to a friend
IR35 II and SDC ThePower - 3/12
    Re: IR35 II and SDC jacksjpt - 6/12

Copyright 1999-2018, Shout99.com | All Rights Reserved
Privacy Notice and Terms of Use