Our website uses cookies to store information on your computer. You may delete and block all cookies from this site, but parts of the site will not work as a result. Find out more about how we use cookies.
(Accept cookies and do not show this message again)
Shout99 - News matters for freelancers
Search Shout99 - News matters for freelancers
(Advanced Search)
   Join Shout99  About Shout99   Sitemap   Contact Shout99 19th Jul 2024
Forgot your password?
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
New Users Click Here
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
Front Page
Freelancers' Shop...
Ask an Expert...
Direct Contracts
Press Links
Question Time
The Clubhouse
Conference Hall...
News from Partners


Business Links

Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660

News for the
Construction Industry

Hardhatter.com - News for small businesses in the construction industry

Powered by
Powered by Novacaster
Platform Blowdown Optimisation
by PDEboss at 09:22 03/02/03 (Seminar>Consultant)
PDE demonstrated it's ability to look beyond the trees when it was asked to review a problem others could not answer.
Quantified Risk Assessment (QRA) work on the Heather platform showed the condensate flash drum to be the largest single contributor to impairment of the Temporary Refuge (the safe location where personnel muster while waiting to be evacuated in an emergency). The key problem was the large inventory of high volatility fluids which would contribute significantly to the hydrocarbon gas released in the event of a leak. The two options available to reduce the risk to the target figure were i) reduce the inventory or ii) increase the blowdown rate to flare so that there was less gas available to leak. Several studies concluded that increasing blowdown rates was not possible as the blowdown piping was already at itís limit and the only solution was to replace the vessel with a smaller one to reduce the inventory.

PDE were asked to provide an independent review of the proposals prior to DNO committing to this extremely costly recommendation.

Unlike previous studies, PDE did not focus on reducing the risk with one single modification, but instead identified ten options that would each partially reduce the risk. The options were ranked using a high level cost-benefit analysis and when tabulated it could be seen how many of the options had to be implemented to achieve the target risk. It was also identified that part of the basis for the QRA work was out of date and current data would result in a lower risk. The findings were presented to DNO who approved the recommendations. PDE managed the Contractor's Process team to design the modifications and were the authorising signatory for all Process deliverables. Using a combination of several small upgrades, DNO achieved 90% of their target risk reduction for significantly less cost than a new vessel and demonstrated an ALARP (As Low As Reasonably Practical) approach to risk had been taken.


Printer Version
Mail this to a friend
Copyright 1999-2018, Shout99.com | All Rights Reserved
Privacy Notice and Terms of Use