Our website uses cookies to store information on your computer. You may delete and block all cookies from this site, but parts of the site will not work as a result. Find out more about how we use cookies.
(Do not show this message again)
Shout99 - News matters for freelancers
Search Shout99 - News matters for freelancers
(Advanced Search)
   Join Shout99  About Shout99   Sitemap   Contact Shout99 1st Jun 2020
Forgot your password?
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
New Users Click Here
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
Front Page
News...
Freelancers' Shop...
Ask an Expert...
Letters
Direct Contracts
Press Links
Question Time
The Clubhouse
Conference Hall...
News from Partners
Accountants

Login
Sitemap

Business Links

Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660

Freelancers' Shop

Personal Financial Services
from ContractorFinancials

Mortgages

Pensions

ISAs

Income protection

... and more special offers for Shout99 readers in the Freelancers' Shop

Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
  
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660

News for the
Construction Industry

Hardhatter.com - News for small businesses in the construction industry

Powered by
Powered by Novacaster
Advertisement
Cogent

Disclosure burden falls on clients
by Susie Hughes at 08:31 11/10/04 (News on Business)
The Treasury has come up with a solution to break the deadlock after lawyers indicated they would not reveal details of their client's tax avoidance arrangements. Get the clients to tell the Revenue themselves.
The Government has been forced to amend the new tax avoidance rules which require accountants and advisers to register tax avoidance schemes with them. The Law Society threw a spanner in the works by advising its members that they could claim legal privilege and not reveal details.

Accountants were angry at this stance as it created an unlevel playing field between the two professions. The revenue has been in talks with the Law Sociary to break the deadlock. Now, the Government has changed the rules to require clients to make a disclosure in place of a promoter where the promoter believes the relevant information is covered by Legal Professional Privilege.

A Treasury announcement said: "These changes put beyond doubt that that all promoters, including the legal profession, are able to comply with their obligations without revealing privileged information.

"The effect of these changes is to ensure the rules operate as intended and apply fairly to everyone in the business of promoting or advising on tax avoidance schemes, including accountants, financial institutions and lawyers.

Lawyers described the changes as a 'sensible compromise', which gave the Revenue what it wanted without infringing on legal privilege.

The client will need to make the disclosure within five days of the first transaction which forms part of the scheme or could face fines of 5,000 if the Revenue discovers an undisclosed scheme and 600 for every further day they persist. Clients finding themselves in this position will have to start making disclosures to the Inland Revenue from 19 November 2004.

The client would also have the option of waiving privilege, thereby allowing the promoter to make a disclosure on their behalf.

However, this is set to create more Red Tape for small businesses who will now have the burden of responsibility for informing the Revenue shifted to them rather than their adviser if they use a lawyer to arrange their tax affairs.

The changes to the legislation so soon after it has come into force has drawn criticism that the Government should have consulted properly and got it right first time.

The amendment affects the Regulations by:

  • removing from the definition of a promoter everyone who cannot comply with the disclosure rules as a consequence of LPP; and
  • moving the obligation to make a disclosure in such cases from the promoter to the client.

The Inland Revenue will be issuing amended guidance shortly to reflect these changes.

See Lawyers drive coach and horse through IR scheme - Sept 2004, Shout99
--
If you wish to comment on this article, please log in and use the Reply button below. Registering is free and easy - see 'Join Shout99'.
-
Susie Hughes Shout99.com 2004

View Comments (Flat Mode) Printer Version

Mail this to a friend
Disclosure burden falls on cli... Susie Hughes - 11/10
    Re: Disclosure burden falls on... njagger53 - 14/10

Copyright 1999-2018, Shout99.com | All Rights Reserved
Privacy Notice and Terms of Use
 

Advertisements
advert
advert
advert
advert