Our website uses cookies to store information on your computer. You may delete and block all cookies from this site, but parts of the site will not work as a result. Find out more about how we use cookies.
(Do not show this message again)
Shout99 - News matters for freelancers
Search Shout99 - News matters for freelancers
(Advanced Search)
   Join Shout99  About Shout99   Sitemap   Contact Shout99 10th Dec 2018
Forgot your password?
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
New Users Click Here
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
Front Page
News...
  Business
  IR35
  Political
  Income shifting/S660
  Viewpoint
  IR591
  Agents
  Newsletters
  Shout99 calls
  Links
Freelancers' Shop...
Ask an Expert...
Letters
Direct Contracts
Press Links
Question Time
The Clubhouse
Conference Hall...
News from Partners
Accountants

Login
Sitemap

Business Links

Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660

Freelancers' Shop

Personal Financial Services
from ContractorFinancials

Mortgages

Pensions

ISAs

Income protection

... and more special offers for Shout99 readers in the Freelancers' Shop

Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
  
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660

News for the
Construction Industry

Hardhatter.com - News for small businesses in the construction industry

Powered by
Powered by Novacaster
Shout99 has a number of special offers for its readers to help you run your small business (click on red links for more information):
PI insurance
From £98 for freelancers and management consultants
Income protection/PHI
Tailored income protection/PHI insurance for freelancers
Pensions
Online pension finder for freelancers
Banking
Specialist banking service for small businesses and freelancers

Qdos: The after chill of Arctic!
by The Editor at 08:30 01/11/07 (Section 660)
The Government is gearing up for another tax hike on freelancers and small businesses in the form of an 'income-shifting tax', Andy Vessey from Qdos COnsulting looks at Section 660, who it affects and what the future might hold.
Andy Vessey writes:

What is Section 660A and who does it affect?
The ‘settlements legislation’, formerly Section 660A Income and Corporation Taxes Act, and now found at Sections 619 et seq , Income Tax (Trading & Other Income) Act, has been on the statute book since the 1930s, but in recent years HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) has been trying to extend the way in which it is applied.

The intention of the legislation is to prevent one person from obtaining a tax advantage by diverting income-generating property to another whilst retaining an interest in that property. It excludes an outright gift to a spouse that is substantially more than a right to income, such as a house that is let to earn rental income.

Following the Pre Budget Report (PBR) 2007, the Government intends to introduce legislation aimed at tackling ‘income shifting’ i.e. income diverted from one spouse to another via company dividends or partnership profits.

Advertisement
The PBR announcement follows HMRC’s defeat and ungracious acceptance of the Arctic Systems decision in the House of Lords and will address the issue of individuals arranging their tax affairs to shift part of their income to another individual who pays tax at a lower rate. The legislation, which will aim to take effect from 6th April 2008, will only apply where income is diverted by way of company dividends or partnership profits. Income from other sources should not be affected

HMRC has stated that it will take into account the activity of individuals in the business, investments that they have made and the risks they are exposed to by being involved in the business.

Legislation
If the Government is intending to push this legislation through for the next tax year then there will only be a short consultation period evoking memories of the MSC consultation period – not a good omen!

The legislation could be applied to many situations in which some form of income-generating property is transferred from one person to another. Up until now HMRC had been focusing attention on family-based companies where some of the shares are in the hands of a spouse who does not perform fee-earning duties on the company’s behalf.

In the case of Mr. and Mrs. Jones of Arctic Systems Ltd, the husband and wife each held 50 per cent of the company shares, but the ruling in the High Court was that the wife’s dividend income should be assessable upon the husband, as if it were solely his income. The husband received a relatively low salary, which left significant profits for the company to pay out as dividends, and the wife undertook no fee-earning duties. There are thousands of small companies operating on a similar basis. Partnerships are also open to attack.

Mr. Jones subsequently won his case at the Court of Appeal and the House of Lords, causing HMRC to resort to introduce ‘income shifting’ legislation as announced in the Pre-Budget Report 2007. The Government hopes to have this in place from 6th April 2008.

Andy Vessey
Senior Tax Manager
Qdos Consulting Limited

Further information
Shout99 has followed the events relating to Section 660. You can also read more about the background to this case and the issues at stake in Shout99's Section 660 resource centre

--
If you wish to comment on this article, please log in and use the Reply button below. Registering is simple and easy to do online - see 'Join Shout99'.
--
The Editor

View Comments (Flat Mode) Printer Version

Mail this to a friend
Qdos: The after chill of Arcti... The Editor - 1/11
    Re: Qdos: The after chill of A... FOOTLEG - 1/11
       Re: Qdos: The after chill of A... jajae - 1/11
          Re: Qdos: The after chill of A... Opsimath - 1/11
             Re: Qdos: The after chill of A... jajae - 2/11
                Something afoot in the City ..... brianc - 2/11
             Re: Qdos: The after chill of A... pooleyr - 3/11
          Re: Qdos: The after chill of A... charlescrane - 1/11
             Re: Qdos: The after chill of A... brianc - 2/11
                Re: Qdos: The after chill of A... FlyingByte - 2/11
                   Hague back at top brianc - 2/11
                      Re: Hague back at top rdale - 2/11
                         Re: Hague back at top brianc - 3/11
                      Who cares? rshearer - 3/11
                         Re: Who cares? brianc - 3/11
                            Re: Who cares? rdale - 3/11
                               Re: Who cares? brianc - 4/11
                                  Re: Who cares? brianc - 4/11
                                  Re: Who cares? jjgradisher - 9/11
                                     Re: Who cares? brianc - 10/11
                                        Re: Who cares? jjgradisher - 10/11
                                           Re: Who cares? pooleyr - 10/11

Copyright 1999-2018, Shout99.com | All Rights Reserved
Privacy Notice and Terms of Use
 

Advertisements
advert
advert
advert
advert