Our website uses cookies to store information on your computer. You may delete and block all cookies from this site, but parts of the site will not work as a result. Find out more about how we use cookies.
(Do not show this message again)
Shout99 - News matters for freelancers
Search Shout99 - News matters for freelancers
(Advanced Search)
   Join Shout99  About Shout99   Sitemap   Contact Shout99 16th Jan 2018
Forgot your password?
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
New Users Click Here
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
Front Page
News...
  Business
  IR35
  Political
  Income shifting/S660
  Viewpoint
  IR591
  Agents
  Newsletters
  Shout99 calls
  Links
Freelancers' Shop...
Ask an Expert...
Letters
Direct Contracts
Press Links
Question Time
The Clubhouse
Conference Hall...
News from Partners
Accountants

Login
Sitemap

Business Links

Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660

Freelancers' Shop

Personal Financial Services
from ContractorFinancials

Mortgages

Pensions

ISAs

Income protection

... and more special offers for Shout99 readers in the Freelancers' Shop

Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
  
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660

News for the
Construction Industry

Hardhatter.com - News for small businesses in the construction industry

Powered by
Powered by Novacaster
Shout99 has a number of special offers for its readers to help you run your small business (click on red links for more information):
PI insurance
From £98 for freelancers and management consultants
Income protection/PHI
Tailored income protection/PHI insurance for freelancers
Pensions
Online pension finder for freelancers
Banking
Specialist banking service for small businesses and freelancers

Concern at practical workings of income shifting
by Susie Hughes at 11:39 07/12/07 (Section 660)
A respected tax body has added its 'grave concerns' about the implications and the practical workings of the draft legislation on income shifting (Section 660).
The effect of the draft legislation proposed is that where a distribution that has been made from a business represents 'shifted income', the individual who has forgone that income should include it on their self-assessment return at the end of the relevant year, for income tax purposes.

This 'arm's length' approach has led to concerns that it will be difficult to apply in practice as it requires taxpayers to access whether income has been 'shifted' and how much income has been 'foregone'. (See: New income shifting proposals are a 'nightmare' - Shout99, Dec 2007)

The Chartered Institute of Taxation (CIOT) says that it has long been of the view that fundamental reform to the structure of small business taxation is necessary if small businesses are to be able to plan their tax affairs with any degree of certainty.

Arm's length
Andrew Hubbard, CIOT Vice-President, said: “The CIOT accepts that what it prefers to regard as 'income sharing' within members of the family unit is an issue which would need to be considered as part of that reform, but regards it as wholly wrong for the Government to deal with this one issue in isolation."

Advertisement
“The legislation imposes an arm's length test and requires taxpayers to work out how much income they have 'foregone' by making a comparison with how the business would have operated had everything been done by independent third parties operating on a fully commercial basis. In theory this might seem fair, but the reality is that family businesses do not and cannot possibly operate on a fully arm's length basis.

"One spouse might be the main income generator but he/she may well be totally unable to run the business without the full support of the other. Measured purely in hours that spouse’s input may not appear to be significant, but that is not the reality of the situation. The support of the spouse may well be the difference between the business succeeding and failing.”

Further information
Shout99 has followed the events relating to Section 660. You can also read more about the background to this case and the issues at stake in Shout99's Section 660 resource centre.

--
If you wish to comment on this article, please log in and use the Reply button below. Registering is free and easy - see 'Join Shout99'.
-
Susie Hughes © Shout99 2007

View Comments (Flat Mode) Printer Version

Mail this to a friend
Concern at practical workings ... Susie Hughes - 7/12
    Re: Concern at practical worki... PAULSC - 7/12
    Re: Concern at practical worki... jardit - 7/12
       Re: Concern at practical worki... charlescrane - 8/12
          Re: Concern at practical worki... btm - 10/12
             Re: Concern at practical worki... charlescrane - 10/12
                Re: Concern at practical worki... btm - 10/12
    Re: Concern at practical worki... MarketFarces - 7/12
    Ideal mythical company mikew - 7/12
    Keep it simple. brianc - 8/12
       What are they afraid of? The f... brianc - 8/12
       Re: Keep it simple. pooleyr - 8/12
          Re: Keep it simple. brianc - 8/12
             Re: Keep it simple. skytraveller - 12/12
       Re: Keep it simple. skytraveller - 12/12
          Obviously it's time for a chan... brianc - 13/12
             Time for change? PAULSC - 13/12
                Re: Time for change? brianc - 15/12
    Re: Concern at practical worki... charlescrane - 8/12
       Re: Concern at practical worki... PAULSC - 8/12
    Re: Concern at practical worki... W-Meister - 8/12
       Re: Concern at practical worki... mikew - 8/12
          Irony......... exbrm - 8/12
             Re: Irony......... xpatjock - 10/12
                Re: Irony......... brianc - 10/12
                Ignorance explained..... exbrm - 10/12
                   MORI agree .... brianc - 11/12
                      Re: MORI agree .... jobyrne - 12/12
                         Re: MORI agree .... skytraveller - 12/12
             Re: Irony......... skytraveller - 12/12
                Re: Irony......... exbrm - 12/12
       Re: Concern at practical worki... charlescrane - 8/12
          Total farce... FlyingByte - 9/12
             Re: Total farce... exbrm - 9/12
                Time for a return to common se... brianc - 10/12
             Re: Total farce... sidsen - 12/12
                Re: Total farce... FlyingByte - 12/12
                   Re: Total farce... skytraveller - 12/12
                Re: Total farce... skytraveller - 12/12
    Re: Concern at practical worki... robwherrett - 12/12

Copyright 1999-2015, Shout99.com | All Rights Reserved | Legal Notice
 

Advertisements
advert
advert
advert
advert