Shout99 - News matters for freelancers Advert
Search Shout99 - News matters for freelancers
(Advanced Search)
   Join Shout99  About Shout99   Sitemap   Contact Shout99 2nd Sep 2010
Forgot your password?
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
New Users Click Here
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
Front Page
News...
Freelancers' Shop...
Ask an Expert...
Letters
Press Links
Question Time
The Clubhouse
Work...
Conference Hall...
News from Partners
Accountants

Login
Sitemap

Business Links

Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660

Freelancers' Shop

Personal Financial Services
from ContractorFinancials

Mortgages

Pensions

ISAs

Income protection

... and more special offers for Shout99 readers in the Freelancers' Shop

Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
  
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660

News for the
Construction Industry

Hardhatter.com - News for small businesses in the construction industry

Powered by
Powered by Novacaster
Advertisement
Brookson

Ltd company contractors excluded from employment rights
by Susie Hughes at 11:53 19/10/09 (News on Business)
Limited company contractors will be excluded from the Agency Workers Directive under the latest proposals from the Government. However, those operating through umbrella companies or who are not 'genuinely self-employed' will be covered.
There has been concerns in the freelance community that the EU-inspired Directive would give contractors similar rights to employees in terms of pay, hours, conditions, holidays etc, making them less attractive to potential clients. The initial aim of the Directive was to protect vulnerable workers who were forced in agency operations so that their employers could avoid statutory rights and benefits.

In the Government's latest response to the consultation process, it sets out its current thinking for the regulations.

Advertisement
It says: ..."implementation will apply to people finding temporary work through a 'temporary work agency' which will be based upon the existing concept of an 'employment business'. The definition of 'agency worker' will be based on that used for 'workers' in the Working Time Regulations 1998, adjusted to reflect the distinctive triangular relationship between an agency worker, the employment business and the hirer. This will exclude workers who are genuinely one of the following: the self-employed; those working through their own limited liability company; or those employed on 'Managed Service Contracts';

"....the scope of the definition does, however, include agency workers contracted to an 'umbrella company', or who operate a personal service company but are not genuinely self-employed, or who are supplied through 'intermediaries' such as Master/Neutral Vendors and any similar 'chain' arrangements. Despite concerns expressed by some respondents, we are concerned that not to include these structures would provide a relatively straightforward way for the unscrupulous to evade the regulations."

Flawed
However, one agency representative body thought that the distinction between limited company and umbrella contractors was flawed.

Ann Swain, Chief Executive of the Association of Professional Staffing Companies (APSCo), said: "While the Government is right to exclude limited company contractors, including umbrella company contractors within this legislation creates an artificial distinction based on corporate structure which does not meaningfully reflect the status of the worker.

"Is the Government really saying that umbrella company contractors are always 'vulnerable' but limited company contractors are not? Clearly there are many umbrella company contractors who earn more than limited company contractors, so this distinction is flawed."

The new rights will apply to agency workers who have been in a position for 12 weeks. It will come into force on October 1, 2011, at the end of the time-scale available to the UK Government for implementation.

For more information see:Implementation of the Agency Workers Directive: Consultation on draft regulations (pdf)

--
If you wish to comment on this article, please log in and use the Reply button below. Registering is free and easy - see 'Join Shout99'.
-
Susie Hughes © Shout99 2009

View Comments (Flat Mode) Printer Version

Mail this to a friend
Ltd company contractors exclud... Susie Hughes - 19/10
    Re: Ltd company contractors ex... ukmike8 - 19/10
       Re: Ltd company contractors ex... fred bloggs - 19/10
    Re: Ltd company contractors ex... SANDSAND - 19/10
       Re: Ltd company contractors ex... pooleyr - 19/10
          Re: Ltd company contractors ex... MarketFarces - 19/10
             Re: Ltd company contractors ex... rosieanddaisy - 19/10
                Re: Ltd company contractors ex... Den-ny - 20/10
                   Re: Ltd company contractors ex... rosieanddaisy - 20/10
                Re: Ltd company contractors ex... pooleyr - 4/11
          Re: Ltd company contractors ex... RichC - 19/10
             Re: Ltd company contractors ex... magicman - 19/10
       Re: Ltd company contractors ex... Den-ny - 20/10
    Re: Ltd company contractors ex... Wilberforce - 19/10
       Re: Ltd company contractors ex... Den-ny - 20/10
       Scrap it all and think again .... brianc - 20/10
    Re: Ltd company contractors ex... akus9901 - 21/10
    Re: Ltd company contractors ex... Den-ny - 21/10
    Re: Ltd company contractors ex... gfisher - 29/10
    Re: Ltd company contractors ex... Richandni - 29/10
       Re: Ltd company contractors ex... gfisher - 29/10

Copyright 1999-2010, Shout99.com | All Rights Reserved | Legal Notice
 

Advertisements
advert
advert
advert
advert
advert
advert