Our website would like to use cookies to store information on your computer. You may delete and block all cookies from this site, but parts of the site will not work as a result. Find out more about how we use cookies.
Shout99 - News matters for freelancers Advert
Search Shout99 - News matters for freelancers
(Advanced Search)
   Join Shout99  About Shout99   Sitemap   Contact Shout99 24th May 2013
Forgot your password?
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
New Users Click Here
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
Front Page
News...
Freelancers' Shop...
Ask an Expert...
Letters
Direct Contracts
Press Links
Question Time
The Clubhouse
Conference Hall...
News from Partners
Accountants

Login
Sitemap

Business Links

Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660

Freelancers' Shop

Personal Financial Services
from ContractorFinancials

Mortgages

Pensions

ISAs

Income protection

... and more special offers for Shout99 readers in the Freelancers' Shop

Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
  
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660

News for the
Construction Industry

Hardhatter.com - News for small businesses in the construction industry

Powered by
Powered by Novacaster
Advertisement
Jobs Board

Do 'personal service companies' save tax?
by Susie Hughes at 10:25 09/10/12 (News on IR35)
The row over the use of so-called personal service companies by public sector and BBC workers has been further fueled when a leading tax expert has said that the perceived tax benefit may not be as great as people suspect.
In an article, ironically for the BBC website, head of taxation at professional accounting body, ACCA, Chas Roy-Chowdhury, explained that the overall take tax from using a limited company for individuals may not be that different from operating under PAYE. While the biggest savings would lie with the 'employer', who does not need to pay employers' national insurance contributions (NIC).

Advertisement
The use of personal service companies by some public sector workers became a media scandal when Head of Students Loans Company, Ed Lester, was 'outed' as operating in this manner. In the light of this the Government took action to control the way it contracts with freelancers, ordered the private sector to sort out its own act or face the consequences and, more recently, the Public Accounts Committee launched a damning attack on this practise, singling out the BBC for particuar attention. (See: Parliamentary Committee launches attack on freelancers - Oct 2012, Shout99)

Mr Roy-Chowdhury questions whether the tax benefit is a myth by giving an example. He says take the case of employment income of £200,000; under PAYE at the varying rates, claw-back on earning over £100,000 and national insurance, the total deductions would amount to £84,653, leaving a net salary of £115,347.

Then he contrasts with someone taking £200,000 income through a PSC. With corporation tax of £40,000 and, say, the remainer taken in the most tax-efficient way of using this arrangement, through dividends, there would be a tax liability of £34,241 as income tax on their dividends, giving a total tax paid of £74,241 and a personal income of £125,758.

Although this is about £10,000 more than the PAYE worker, this doesn't take into account the costs of running a business.

Mr Roy-Chowdhury explained that the 'the real cost saving' could be with the employer, in terms of employer's NI. In the given example, an employers' NI would be £26,567 under PAYE and nothing if they are contracting as a 'client' rather than an 'employer' with someone using a personal service company.

--
If you wish to comment on this article, please log in and use the Reply button below. Registering is free and easy - see 'Join Shout99'.
-
Susie Hughes © Shout99 2012

View Comments (Flat Mode) Printer Version

Mail this to a friend
Do 'personal service companies... Susie Hughes - 9/10
    Re: Do 'personal service compa... richydehav - 9/10
       Rubbish article. asif999999 - 9/10
          Re: Rubbish article. asif999999 - 9/10
          Re: Rubbish article. jocksaway - 9/10
             Re: Rubbish article. asif999999 - 9/10
    Re: Do 'personal service compa... jocksaway - 9/10
       Re: Do 'personal service compa... asif999999 - 9/10
          Re: Do 'personal service compa... snodgrasse - 11/10
             Re: Do 'personal service compa... asif999999 - 11/10
                Re: Do 'personal service compa... pacontracting - 11/10
                   Re: Do 'personal service compa... asif999999 - 11/10
                      Re: Do 'personal service compa... pacontracting - 12/10
                      Yes Aziv we know and many agre... brianc - 12/10
                Re: Do 'personal service compa... snodgrasse - 12/10
                   Did he cheat? Because ... brianc - 13/10
                   Re: Do 'personal service compa... asif999999 - 13/10
                      Re: Do 'personal service compa... snodgrasse - 14/10
       Re: Do 'personal service compa... asif999999 - 9/10
          Re: Do 'personal service compa... IANTO - 10/10
             Re: Do 'personal service compa... asif999999 - 10/10
             Re: Do 'personal service compa... brianc - 10/10
                Re: Do 'personal service compa... asif999999 - 10/10
                Do we want moles here? brianc - 11/10
             Re: Do 'personal service compa... snodgrasse - 11/10
                Re: Do 'personal service compa... asif999999 - 11/10
          Re: Do 'personal service compa... snodgrasse - 11/10
             Re: Do 'personal service compa... asif999999 - 11/10
    Re: Do 'personal service compa... med - 9/10
       Re: Do 'personal service compa... jocksaway - 9/10
       Re: Do 'personal service compa... IANTO - 10/10
    Susie - we need to be talking ... brianc - 10/10
    I had to laugh!! ihm - 10/10
    Re: Do 'personal service compa... PAULSC - 10/10
    Compare like with like ! mikew - 16/10

Copyright 1999-2012, Shout99.com | All Rights Reserved | Legal Notice
 

Advertisements
advert
advert
advert
advert