Our website uses cookies to store information on your computer. You may delete and block all cookies from this site, but parts of the site will not work as a result. Find out more about how we use cookies.
(Do not show this message again)
Shout99 - News matters for freelancers
Search Shout99 - News matters for freelancers
(Advanced Search)
   Join Shout99  About Shout99   Sitemap   Contact Shout99 2nd Dec 2020
Forgot your password?
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
New Users Click Here
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
Front Page
Freelancers' Shop...
Ask an Expert...
Direct Contracts
Press Links
Question Time
The Clubhouse
Conference Hall...
News from Partners


Business Links

Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660

Freelancers' Shop

Personal Financial Services
from ContractorFinancials




Income protection

... and more special offers for Shout99 readers in the Freelancers' Shop

Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660

News for the
Construction Industry

Hardhatter.com - News for small businesses in the construction industry

Powered by
Powered by Novacaster
Shout99 Jobs

Do you work for AK Macefield ?
by graham5 at 14:45 03/02/14 (Letters from Freelancers)
Another HMR&C problem...it seems that they have issued a number of coding notices for 14-15 with Mr. Macefield's name as employer when he isn't.
I've just received a coding notice for 14-15 which should be for an Aviva pension. Everything on the letter seems reasonable: my name and details are correct, the employer's tax reference is correct and yet the employer's name is given as AK Macefield.

And Mr. Macefield is a nice gentleman, I was the third person to telephone him and he hadn't lost his sense of humour, yet. And he does appear to be the only AK Macefield and does figure very well in searches for AK Macefield. There didn't appear to be much logic, he's in Stroud, the other two who contacted him were in Brighton, I'm in west Wales. As I pointed out to him I wonder how many others have his name and haven't telephoned him.

I did speak to the revenue and they assured me it was just an administrative error and a correction would be issued - I could hear the person I spoke to be talked to by someone else in the background but I couldn't hear what was being said but I did wonder.

If it is only the employer's name that they have gotten wrong it is perhaps not that serious but it does suggest that there is something just a bit awry with some database or other.

View Comments (Flat Mode) Printer Version

Mail this to a friend
Do you work for AK Macefield ? graham5 - 3/02
    Re: Do you work for AK Macefie... pF - 27/02

Copyright 1999-2018, Shout99.com | All Rights Reserved
Privacy Notice and Terms of Use