The 'false self employment' rules are targeted at lower paid workers who are engaged - often without their own knowledge or understanding - via mass-marketed schemes so that they have self-employed status allowing their hirers to avoid their financial obligations. The new rules are aimed at preventing this and should not have a bearing on 'genuine businesses'.
Adrian Marlowe, managing director of Lawspeed, said: “Recruitment agencies contracting directly with hirers are liable for PAYE payments if the new rules apply. This means that they should be diligent right now in checking that the individuals they supply are not being paid gross by the intermediaries they are engaged through. This issue is of particular importance to those operating in the construction industry, where it is common for gross payments to be made under the CIS tax scheme. There is no provision in the law that allows agencies to put this off, leaving those who are slow to pick up on it at greatest risk of having to make back payments to HMRC. "
The new law, set out in the Finance Bill 2014, amends the agency tax legislation and requires PAYE, including employers NICs, to be applied to payments to the individual unless it is shown that the individual is not subject to any person’s supervision, direction or control as to the manner of the services (SDC test).
This applies to all and any intermediaries including personal service companies with the agency contracting with the client liable. Debts of liable agencies can now be transferred to directors personally of those companies. The new rules however do not apply if the individual is already paid for the work done by way of employment income.
Mr Marlowe said: “The SDC test is very difficult to assess, and HMRC will start with the presumption that there is control, leaving the agency to establish the opposite. This is against the backdrop that our reading of the law is that it applies to any services performed by an individual whether through a company or otherwise, regardless of sector.
“We have already seen some simplistic methods to address the tax, for example by simply asking the client whether there is SDC. In our view this would not normally suffice to establish the position one way or another and we certainly could not advise agencies to rely on this when their directors face the draconian penalty of personal liability if they get it wrong.”
If you wish to comment on this article, please log in and use the Reply button below. Registering is free and easy - see 'Join Shout99'.
Susie Hughes © Shout99 2014