Our website uses cookies to store information on your computer. You may delete and block all cookies from this site, but parts of the site will not work as a result. Find out more about how we use cookies.
(Do not show this message again)
Shout99 - News matters for freelancers Advert
Search Shout99 - News matters for freelancers
(Advanced Search)
   Join Shout99  About Shout99   Sitemap   Contact Shout99 19th Dec 2014
Forgot your password?
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
New Users Click Here
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
Front Page
News...
Freelancers' Shop...
Ask an Expert...
Letters
Direct Contracts
Press Links
Question Time
The Clubhouse
Conference Hall...
News from Partners
Accountants

Login
Sitemap

Business Links

Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660

Freelancers' Shop

Personal Financial Services
from ContractorFinancials

Mortgages

Pensions

ISAs

Income protection

... and more special offers for Shout99 readers in the Freelancers' Shop

Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
  
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660

News for the
Construction Industry

Hardhatter.com - News for small businesses in the construction industry

Powered by
Powered by Novacaster
Advertisement
Shout99 Jobs

Call to scrap plans for HMRC debt recovery powers
by Susie Hughes at 13:20 29/07/14 (News on Business)
Small business representatives are urging the Government to scrap its plans to give new powers to HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) to recover outstanding debts directly from small business’s bank accounts.
The proposals – announced in the Budget in March 2014 – will give HMRC inspectors the power to recover funds from the self employed and small businesses, where it is deemed they have sufficient money to pay the outstanding debt, with relevant safeguards in place. (See: MPs raise concerns about HMRC's proposed debt recovery powers - May 2014, Shout99)

While the measures do include the need to assess the 12-month debtor history in the decision, the Forum of Private Business argues that the proposals could be seen as unfairly targeting small firms. They also fail to take into account unexpected costs often facing small businesses such as stock or new investment, which can be considerable and above the allowed £5,000 cash safety net outlined in the plans.

Condemnation
Alexander Jackman, Head of Policy at the Forum of Private Business, said: “Our members are unequivocal in their condemnation of tax avoidance and the tax evasion practices that have received significant coverage in the media, in particular the practices of large corporates.

Advertisement
“However, many of our members already feel that they are unfairly targeted by HMRC and these proposals do little to dispel this commonly held belief. The smaller scope of their operations means many small business owners feel much more vulnerable to investigations than larger firms with more complex tax arrangements.

“Small firms are only just recovering from the increased regulatory burden of Real Time Information on their accounts and this is only set to increase with the introduction of pensions auto enrolment. As a result this makes them extremely wary of any plans to give additional powers to the taxman.

“The sheer variances of cash flow in different types of businesses and the limited resources available to effectively implement these proposals are also a real concern. These proposals, if introduced, could leave many of our members feeling that they are being unfairly targeted and government should seriously reconsider.”

--
If you wish to comment on this article, please log in and use the Reply button below. Registering is free and easy - see 'Join Shout99'.
-
Susie Hughes © Shout99 2014

Printer Version

Mail this to a friend

Copyright 1999-2012, Shout99.com | All Rights Reserved | Legal Notice
 

Advertisements
advert
advert
advert
advert