Our website uses cookies to store information on your computer. You may delete and block all cookies from this site, but parts of the site will not work as a result. Find out more about how we use cookies.
(Accept cookies and do not show this message again)
Shout99 - News matters for freelancers
Search Shout99 - News matters for freelancers
(Advanced Search)
   Join Shout99  About Shout99   Sitemap   Contact Shout99 25th Apr 2024
Forgot your password?
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
New Users Click Here
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
Front Page
News...
Freelancers' Shop...
Ask an Expert...
Letters
Direct Contracts
Press Links
Question Time
The Clubhouse
Conference Hall...
News from Partners
Accountants

Login
Sitemap

Business Links

Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660

Freelancers' Shop

Personal Financial Services
from ContractorFinancials

Mortgages

Pensions

ISAs

Income protection

... and more special offers for Shout99 readers in the Freelancers' Shop

Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
  
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660

News for the
Construction Industry

Hardhatter.com - News for small businesses in the construction industry

Powered by
Powered by Novacaster
Advertisement
Cogent

Government's failure to legislate could lead to IR35 Mark 2
by Susie Hughes at 13:06 27/07/15 (News on IR35)
IR35 is back on the political agenda with a Government consultation document which promises 'Son of IR35' or IR35 Mark 2.
It is not yet certain if this will be a watered down version of the original or one with more teeth. But judging by the Government's rhetoric, the latter sounds more likely.

Five years ago, the freelancer lobby groups had hopes that a Conservative Government might abolish the controversial contractor tax. Now, the opposite seems likely as the consultation paper after the Summer Budget talks about IR35 not being effective enough; non-compliance estimated to cost over £400 million a year; and finding a solution that protects the Exchequer and improves fairness in the system. See: IR35 Mark 2 heads closer as Government consults - Shout99, July 2015.

David Greene of specialist contractor service providers, Nasa Consulting argues that the Government’s failure to legislate on self-employment status is heading to industry damage under HMRC’s new IR35 review.

He writes:

The Government’s failure to legislate on self-employment status is heading to industry damage under HMRC’s new IR35 review.

HMRC have stated they are now reviewing the application of IR35 as it’s not ‘working’ for them. In their just released consultation document, they are using a throw away emotional line to say that freelancers avoiding taxes or national insurances are putting HMRC’s tax income at risk.

Independently of this, the UK tax courts have found (see MBF Design v HMRC 2011) that freelancers are genuinely self-employed and are not avoiding employment taxes, thus we can take this HMRC line as subterfuge for something else, i.e. to cobble together unfair rules to increase their tax take.

Dividend
In light of the new 7.5 per cent tax on dividends, it is now the case that incorporated freelance workers provide a total tax and NI take in line with non-incorporated self-employed workers.

Although this 7.5 per cent dividend rate is below the NI rate of the self-employed, it starts at a lower level and is uncapped at the higher levels resulting in a probable excess of deductions for those that have set up their own company to protect their self-employment risk.

Sledgehammer
HMRC have said they believe many of the self-employed are actually employed. This is a one sided judgement, which they have continually used in IR35 assessments, and found to be incorrect time and time again by industry and by the courts.

HMRC are now heading towards a new sledgehammer approach of using only one element (control, substitution or direction) of employment status tests to capture freelancer workers into paying employment status taxes without giving them employment rights or benefits.

In this author's experience of handling IR35 status cases against HMRC, HMRC will find workers liable to extra taxes and national insurance on unreasonable grounds and without an independence of opinion.

Swathes of workers and end clients will be burdened with significant tax and NI increases, in exactly the areas that the UK Courts have found them not to be liable to the extra taxes.

Erroneous
Whilst there is little doubt that the self-employed should not be classified as employed, and vice versa, it is extremely dangerous for HMRC to be allowed to make a tax judgement that is erroneous, as well as inherently unfair on those that suffer from the process.

With a plethora of self-employment status cases having passed through the courts in the last 15 years since IR35 was introduced, it is time that Parliament takes a lead on this.

Parliament should set out the tests of self-employment, which are much defined in cases like MBF Design v HMRC. As with non-incorporated self-employed workers, the end users and the workers will then know where they stand with tax and national insurance liabilities and prevent misuse of status by all parties.

For interested parties who want to see HMRC’s ‘discussion’ document on IR35 and to submit opinions to HMRC, the link is here.

The author of this article, David Greene is a director of a payroll and an accountancy services company, and therefore provides this article without bias towards workers retaining self-employment status.

**********************************************
Advertisement - Freelancer Outside IR35 (FO35)
**********************************************

Advertisement
Protection against disputes with HMRC on tax matters, including IR35, is available for £116.00 a year.

Freelancers Outside IR35 (FO35) is a complete operating system for small businesses with guidance on compliance; draft contracts; a helpline; status assessments; and representation by Qdos Consulting in the event of a dispute with the Revenue on tax; VAT; or IR35 issues.

FO35 is available online for immediate cover for £116.00 a year. For more information or to order, see......Freelancers Outside IR35 (FO35).

IR35
For general coverage of IR35 policy and cases see Shout99's News on IR35 section.

Alerts also available through our Twitter feed.

--
If you wish to comment on this article, please log in and use the Reply button below. Registering is free and easy - see 'Join Shout99'.
-
Susie Hughes © Shout99 2015

--

Printer Version

Mail this to a friend

Copyright 1999-2018, Shout99.com | All Rights Reserved
Privacy Notice and Terms of Use
 

Advertisements
advert
advert
advert
advert