Our website uses cookies to store information on your computer. You may delete and block all cookies from this site, but parts of the site will not work as a result. Find out more about how we use cookies.
(Accept cookies and do not show this message again)
Shout99 - News matters for freelancers
Search Shout99 - News matters for freelancers
(Advanced Search)
   Join Shout99  About Shout99   Sitemap   Contact Shout99 24th Apr 2024
Forgot your password?
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
New Users Click Here
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
Front Page
News...
Freelancers' Shop...
Ask an Expert...
Letters
Direct Contracts
Press Links
Question Time
The Clubhouse
Conference Hall...
News from Partners
Accountants

Login
Sitemap

Business Links

Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660

Freelancers' Shop

Personal Financial Services
from ContractorFinancials

Mortgages

Pensions

ISAs

Income protection

... and more special offers for Shout99 readers in the Freelancers' Shop

Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
  
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660

News for the
Construction Industry

Hardhatter.com - News for small businesses in the construction industry

Powered by
Powered by Novacaster
Advertisement
Cogent

Government fails to prepare for contractors expenses changes
by Susie Hughes at 16:30 23/11/15 (News on Business)
Whitehall has been accused of 'appalling complacency' after it emerged a string of vital Departments have failed to study the potential impact of the threatened tax changes on their budgets.
Experts fear the availability of contractors will drop drastically if travel expenses are slashed as proposed in April, hitting essential public services.

An announcement is due over the controversial changes in this week’s Autumn Statement.

Trade body PRISM, which has been campaigning to defeat the plans, quizzed a selection of Whitehall departments using freedom of information laws.

Departments in charge of education, health, energy and climate change and transport were all asked what measures they had taken to try to assess the impact of the policy change. They all revealed no impact assessment had been carried out.

CEO Crawford Temple said: “The lack of planning and horizon scanning by departments responsible for some of our most treasured public services demonstrates appalling complacency.

“How can you plan for expenditure if you don't foresee the most flexible workers, those you turn to when gaps appear, expecting significantly more for their time.”

Advertisement
PRISM earlier estimated the cost of the changes to contractors in various sectors:
  • in the construction sector will lose £6,084 a year on average;
  • nurses £4,650 a year; and
  • supply teachers £3,252 a year.

Mr Temple said the Ministry of Defence had misunderstood the changes altogether, with officials apparently believing they would be unaffected by the changes because they rarely paid out such expenses directly to workers.

The MoD, which spent £136m on agency workers in the financial year to April 2015, stated: “The Chancellor of the Exchequer’s announcement in the 2015 Budget that tax relief will be restricted for home-to-duty travel and subsistence by workers engaged through an employment intermediary will have minimal impact on MOD spending levels.

“This is because, under the Civil Service Management Code, Government departments and agencies are permitted to meet part or all of the cost of home-to-duty travel only in exceptional circumstances.”

The Department for Transport said it had not carried out an impact assessment but anticipated the impact would be 'negligible in the context of the Department’s overall budget'.

--
If you wish to comment on this article, please log in and use the Reply button below. Registering is free and easy - see 'Join Shout99'.
-
Susie Hughes © Shout99 2015

Printer Version

Mail this to a friend

Copyright 1999-2018, Shout99.com | All Rights Reserved
Privacy Notice and Terms of Use
 

Advertisements
advert
advert
advert
advert