Our website uses cookies to store information on your computer. You may delete and block all cookies from this site, but parts of the site will not work as a result. Find out more about how we use cookies.
(Accept cookies and do not show this message again)
Shout99 - News matters for freelancers
Search Shout99 - News matters for freelancers
(Advanced Search)
   Join Shout99  About Shout99   Sitemap   Contact Shout99 25th Apr 2024
Forgot your password?
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
New Users Click Here
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
Front Page
News...
Freelancers' Shop...
Ask an Expert...
Letters
Direct Contracts
Press Links
Question Time
The Clubhouse
Conference Hall...
News from Partners
Accountants

Login
Sitemap

Business Links

Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660

Freelancers' Shop

Personal Financial Services
from ContractorFinancials

Mortgages

Pensions

ISAs

Income protection

... and more special offers for Shout99 readers in the Freelancers' Shop

Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
  
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660

News for the
Construction Industry

Hardhatter.com - News for small businesses in the construction industry

Powered by
Powered by Novacaster
Advertisement
Cogent

Agency group slams 'sham' consultation on NHS workers
by Susie Hughes at 13:36 24/11/15 (News on Business)
Agency trade group, APSCo, has accused Health Secretary, Jeremy Hunt of a sham consultation on NHS agency worker price caps which came into force yesterday, 23 November.
The group says that it will seriously compromise patient safety – and expose Trusts to legal risk.

Samantha Hurley, Head of External Relations & Compliance at APSCo, said: “The consultation on proposed price caps for NHS agency workers closed on Friday 13 November – I cannot see how the responses can have been collated, read, considered and decisions made within five working days of the consultation closing – this is a complete sham.

“This is just another example of Mr Hunt riding roughshod over professional opinion and common sense. At best it displays a total ignorance of the staffing issues being faced by the Department he heads up – at worst it is headline grabbling political posturing.”

In its own response to the consultation APSCo pointed out that it supports the Government’s efforts to control expenditure – and in principle also supports the introduction of price caps but feels that the Government is trying to do too much too soon.

Ms Hurley said: “The Government initiative to mandate the use of framework agreements was already having a positive effect on the sector and Trusts have been liaising well with our members to remove their off framework expenditure.

Advertisement
“It would make much more sense to wait and quantify the savings from this measure before pushing on with rules which will not only affect patient safety but also expose Trusts to legal risks of breaches of contract. This is because there are existing contracts in place for supply at specific rates which are likely to run beyond today’s date and to avoid legal challenges notice periods will have to be given. It is clear that Mr Hunt just hasn’t thought this through and our members are telling us that NHS Trusts are expressing real concern about how they will fulfil these requirements.

“Even more concerning is that these caps will put patient safety at risk because they will destabilise the quality and continuity of flexible staffing into the NHS. The consultation document stated that the price caps are intended to ‘encourage staff to return to permanent and bank working.’ This is simply naïve. Agency workers within the NHS work flexibly because their family life or lifestyle does not allow them to work permanently.

"Taking away flexibility means that not only will Trusts be unable to fulfil their staffing requirements because temporary staff will move away from the NHS, but also the quality, safeguarding and compliance of staff will suffer. What does not appear in the headlines about agency staff is that recruitment firms undertake a level of compliance and safeguarding in excess of the NHS’ own standards – which currently costs the agency between £300 and £450 per worker. The price caps will make this level of expenditure unsustainable.”

“The Government’s answer to patient safety levels is a loophole in the price cap rules which allow caps to be ‘overridden in the interests of patient safety’ – this is likely to become the norm and the result will be a ‘black market’ of off framework expenditure –which will increase, rather than reduce agency spend."

--
If you wish to comment on this article, please log in and use the Reply button below. Registering is free and easy - see 'Join Shout99'.
-
Susie Hughes © Shout99 2015

Printer Version

Mail this to a friend

Copyright 1999-2018, Shout99.com | All Rights Reserved
Privacy Notice and Terms of Use
 

Advertisements
advert
advert
advert
advert