Our website uses cookies to store information on your computer. You may delete and block all cookies from this site, but parts of the site will not work as a result. Find out more about how we use cookies.
(Accept cookies and do not show this message again)
Shout99 - News matters for freelancers
Search Shout99 - News matters for freelancers
(Advanced Search)
   Join Shout99  About Shout99   Sitemap   Contact Shout99 19th Apr 2024
Forgot your password?
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
New Users Click Here
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
Front Page
News...
Freelancers' Shop...
Ask an Expert...
Letters
Direct Contracts
Press Links
Question Time
The Clubhouse
Conference Hall...
News from Partners
Accountants

Login
Sitemap

Business Links

Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660

Freelancers' Shop

Personal Financial Services
from ContractorFinancials

Mortgages

Pensions

ISAs

Income protection

... and more special offers for Shout99 readers in the Freelancers' Shop

Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
  
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660

News for the
Construction Industry

Hardhatter.com - News for small businesses in the construction industry

Powered by
Powered by Novacaster
Advertisement
Cogent

Warning about dangers of reclassifying temporary staff
by Susie Hughes at 10:57 22/04/16 (News on Business)
Agencies that advise employers to reclassify temporary staff as 'unsupervised' are putting both their end clients and their directors in jeopardy, according a contractor management company.
CXC Global EMEA has warned agencies that following the advice laid out by one recruitment firm recently to reclassify their temporary workers could result in huge fines for their end clients as well as significant punishments for the organisation’s directors.

According to an article in the Guardian, a leaked report showed that a recruitment firm advised some of Britain’s top construction companies to reclassify temporary staff on some of the UK’s largest building sites as 'unsupervised' in an effort to avoid a clampdown on a tax loophole.

The Chancellor, George Osborne, introduced measures earlier this month designed to tighten rules on how contractors and temporary workers can claim tax relief on their travel and subsistence expenses.

According to the legislation, any self-employed professional who doesn’t require the ‘supervision, direction or control’ (SDC) of their employer can claim these tax breaks, while all other workers cannot.

A presentation leaked by the Unite union has found that one recruitment firm has advised its clients to reclassify temporary staff as “unsupervised” in an effort to avoid the clampdown on the loophole.

Wrong
However, this advice has met with concern in some quarters.

Michelle Reilly, managing director of CXC Global EMEA said: “It’s simply wrong to advise businesses and professionals not to operate under SDC. The classification is down to HMRC’s interpretation and advising firms in this way is incredibly risky, particularly when they and their board of directors can be held personally liable.

"After all, nothing ruins a business relationship like a huge fine for the wrongdoing of one of your suppliers.

Advertisement
However, the Government must also take some of the blame for agencies adopting this approach. While they’re clear about putting in place overly restrictive rules for the contractor workforce, they’re certainly not clear about how to test for SDC, which leads to situations like this where agencies are essentially making up their own rules. Let’s be clear – this particular agency is in the wrong, but the Government also has a part to play.”

“Umbrella companies currently operate a three step test which tests for the presence of SDC and involves a questionnaire, a rates based system and an assessment of the contract itself, which isn’t robust enough to provide a level playing field for contractors.

"Here at CXC, we’ve completely moved away from this model and believe that unless a contractor or temporary worker is operating through their own Ltd Company, they should be classified as a PAYE employee. And to manage this change and better reflect the service we’re providing we’ve reduced our margins, which benefits contractors. If professionals want to be paid the money that they’re missing out on from travel and subsistence tax breaks, then that has to come from the agency or the end client, not from HMRC.”

--
If you wish to comment on this article, please log in and use the Reply button below. Registering is free and easy - see 'Join Shout99'.
-
Susie Hughes © Shout99 2016

Printer Version

Mail this to a friend

Copyright 1999-2018, Shout99.com | All Rights Reserved
Privacy Notice and Terms of Use
 

Advertisements
advert
advert
advert
advert