Our website uses cookies to store information on your computer. You may delete and block all cookies from this site, but parts of the site will not work as a result. Find out more about how we use cookies.
(Accept cookies and do not show this message again)
Shout99 - News matters for freelancers
Search Shout99 - News matters for freelancers
(Advanced Search)
   Join Shout99  About Shout99   Sitemap   Contact Shout99 18th Apr 2024
Forgot your password?
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
New Users Click Here
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
Front Page
News...
Freelancers' Shop...
Ask an Expert...
Letters
Direct Contracts
Press Links
Question Time
The Clubhouse
Conference Hall...
News from Partners
Accountants

Login
Sitemap

Business Links

Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660

Freelancers' Shop

Personal Financial Services
from ContractorFinancials

Mortgages

Pensions

ISAs

Income protection

... and more special offers for Shout99 readers in the Freelancers' Shop

Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
  
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660

News for the
Construction Industry

Hardhatter.com - News for small businesses in the construction industry

Powered by
Powered by Novacaster
Advertisement
Cogent

Agents express frustration with HMRC's IR35 reforms
by Susie Hughes at 08:40 21/10/16 (News on IR35)
Members of agency group APSCo voiced their frustration at what was deemed as a lack of clarity and information around the proposed public sector IR35 reforms from key members of HMRC’s employment status policy team.
Advertisement
Following the Government consultation over the summer on proposals which will give recruitment firms and other engagers liability and responsibility for defining the employment status of Personal Service Company (PSC) contractors for tax purposes, HMRC policy team members, Neil Chattell and Julie De Brito took questions on the reforms including the proposed new digital tool which will be used to define a contractor’s employment status.

However, APSCo members were left frustrated at the lack of concrete answers around a number of issues including the time frame in which recruitment firms would be expected to implement the changes, the scope of the reform in particular whether it covers placements into contractors delivering services to the public sector and HMRC’s opinion on the risk to the public sector of losing access to talent.

One member said: “You have had a good two to three years to prevaricate and procrastinate on this issue. And yet we probably won’t have any real detail on the guidance until the March budget which gives us a matter of weeks to implement any changes.”

Frustration
There was also frustration over the new digital tool with members asking if there would be a legal defence if they were to input information which they were given by a client or contractor in good faith but which later turned out to be incorrect – or if something had changed about the nature of the assignment to which the recruitment firm was not party. The only answer HMRC could give was that: ‘they were looking at it’.

When asked specifically whether they had looked at the access to talent issue in terms of the almost inevitable flight of in-demand skills – and specifically whether a cost assessment of how that would impact on the public sector had been completed, HMRC had no substantive answers.

Tania Bowers, APSCo’s General Counsel, who was at the meeting, said: “HMRC were unwilling to give any steer on their approach to the reforms following consultation. Our members were left frustrated at the number of fundamental issues on which they are still awaiting answers, not least how they will accurately determine firstly who is in scope, then the correct employment status of workers, a complex legal decision in itself and lastly calculate the correct tax computation.

"They are very concerned they will be left with no more than a matter of weeks to implement changes in Spring 2017.

“Further, the access to talent question is key. In fact a report last week in Computer Weekly revealed that there had been ”a mass walk out of IT contractors” from a Ministry of Defence agency which has left several major IT projects on hold as a result of the agency seeking to enforce PAYE taxes on contractors.

"If these reforms go ahead, the cost to Government for flexible labour will increase. The cost of the additional PAYE tax and National Insurance Contributions will either be passed on to the public sector end-client, along with other statutory costs or be borne by the contractor.

"Our members are telling us that skilled, independent contractors are likely to leave the public sector rather than see their rates reduce significantly, potentially leading to a talent drain from central Government and the broader public sector just as the UK triggers Article 50.”

--
If you wish to comment on this article, please log in and use the Reply button below. Registering is free and easy - see 'Join Shout99'.
-
Susie Hughes © Shout99 2016

View Comments (Flat Mode) Printer Version

Mail this to a friend
Agents express frustration wit... Susie Hughes - 21/10
    Re: Agents express frustration... alexroebuck - 1/11

Copyright 1999-2018, Shout99.com | All Rights Reserved
Privacy Notice and Terms of Use
 

Advertisements
advert
advert
advert
advert