Our website uses cookies to store information on your computer. You may delete and block all cookies from this site, but parts of the site will not work as a result. Find out more about how we use cookies.
(Accept cookies and do not show this message again)
Shout99 - News matters for freelancers
Search Shout99 - News matters for freelancers
(Advanced Search)
   Join Shout99  About Shout99   Sitemap   Contact Shout99 20th Apr 2024
Forgot your password?
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
New Users Click Here
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
Front Page
News...
Freelancers' Shop...
Ask an Expert...
Letters
Direct Contracts
Press Links
Question Time
The Clubhouse
Conference Hall...
News from Partners
Accountants

Login
Sitemap

Business Links

Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660

Freelancers' Shop

Personal Financial Services
from ContractorFinancials

Mortgages

Pensions

ISAs

Income protection

... and more special offers for Shout99 readers in the Freelancers' Shop

Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
  
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660

News for the
Construction Industry

Hardhatter.com - News for small businesses in the construction industry

Powered by
Powered by Novacaster
Advertisement
Cogent

Government focuses on 'abusive' tax arrangements
by Susie Hughes at 12:39 06/12/16 (News on Business)
The Government has announced that proposals to penalise ‘enablers’ of tax avoidance schemes will be focused on abusive arrangements that 'no one could mistake for a reasonable commercial arrangement'.
Advertisement
Professional tax bodies had been concerned that the original proposals, consulted on earlier this year, were too widely drawn and could have resulted in some taxpayers and businesses being unable to get expert advice on complicated and often unclear areas of tax law.

The Chartered Institute of Taxation (CIOT) welcomed the increased focus of Government action on ‘enablers’ of tax avoidance. The CIOT had argued that the original proposals could have penalised advisers who gave perfectly reasonable and legitimate advice to clients on commercial transactions.

The Government has also announced proposals for a change to the existing penalty legislation which applies to those who use avoidance which is exposed and defeated by the tax authority.

Balanced approach
The key elements of the new enabling penalty are that it will:

  • apply to abusive schemes defeated by HMRC;
  • impose a fixed 100 per cent fee based penalty on everyone in the supply chain
  • apply to advice provided after the Finance Bill 2017 receives Royal Asset next year.

John Cullinane, CIOT’s Tax Policy Director, said: “It is pleasing to see that after a wide ranging consultation with the CIOT and other stakeholders, the Government has taken on board our concerns and recognises that the vast majority of tax professionals providing advice on commercial arrangements are in no sense ‘enabling tax avoidance’ but are simply helping their clients to understand as well as comply with their tax obligations.

“It is crucial that they can continue to do so without being exposed to this new penalty.

“The moves outlined in this draft legislation present a measured and balanced approach towards tackling those who enable tax avoidance while ensuring that the interests of the overwhelming majority of agents who provide genuine professional advice to their clients are protected.

“By defining ‘abusive tax arrangements’ around the principles of the General Anti-Abuse Rule (GAAR) – which asks whether entering into or carrying out the tax arrangements could have been a reasonable course of action – the proposals are better focused on the small minority of advisers who profit from devising, marketing and facilitating aggressive tax avoidance schemes.

“We are also encouraged that in proposing these changes, the Government has welcomed the progress made by the seven leading tax and accountancy professional bodies in revising the code of conduct for our members, the Professional Conduct in Relation to Taxation (PCRT).

“In particular, it is heartening to note that by adhering to and upholding the standards set out in the PCRT, the Government does not expect members to be affected by this policy.”

Penalties
John Cullinane continued: “It is essential that the penalties contained within the legislation for the minority of tax promoters who choose not to play by the rules act as a deterrent for others while remaining proportionate to the nature of the offence

“In this respect therefore, plans to impose a penalty based on the amount of consideration received by the enabler for their role in the arrangements, rather than as had been proposed, the amount of tax avoided, are a much more proportionate approach.

“We also welcome clarification that the penalty will apply to enabling that takes place only after the date that this legislation comes into force.”


--
If you wish to comment on this article, please log in and use the Reply button below. Registering is free and easy - see 'Join Shout99'.
-
Susie Hughes © Shout99 2016

Printer Version

Mail this to a friend

Copyright 1999-2018, Shout99.com | All Rights Reserved
Privacy Notice and Terms of Use
 

Advertisements
advert
advert
advert
advert