Our website uses cookies to store information on your computer. You may delete and block all cookies from this site, but parts of the site will not work as a result. Find out more about how we use cookies.
(Accept cookies and do not show this message again)
Shout99 - News matters for freelancers
Search Shout99 - News matters for freelancers
(Advanced Search)
   Join Shout99  About Shout99   Sitemap   Contact Shout99 29th Mar 2024
Forgot your password?
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
New Users Click Here
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
Front Page
News...
Freelancers' Shop...
Ask an Expert...
Letters
Direct Contracts
Press Links
Question Time
The Clubhouse
Conference Hall...
News from Partners
Accountants

Login
Sitemap

Business Links

Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660

Freelancers' Shop

Personal Financial Services
from ContractorFinancials

Mortgages

Pensions

ISAs

Income protection

... and more special offers for Shout99 readers in the Freelancers' Shop

Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
  
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660

News for the
Construction Industry

Hardhatter.com - News for small businesses in the construction industry

Powered by
Powered by Novacaster
Advertisement
Cogent

Responsibility for contractors' IR35 lies with public sector clients
by Susie Hughes at 11:55 09/12/16 (Political News)
The details relating to the controversial public sector off-payroll legislation have revealed the surprise that the responsibility for deciding if IR35 applies will be with the client or 'end-user'.
Advertisement
And it has been confirmed that the responsibility for paying the tax if IR35 does apply will be with the agency or the third-party who pays the contractor.

The public sector off-payroll rules have been the subject of detailed consultation and much criticism since the Government announced its intention to clamp down on the payment methods of contractors operating in the public sector.

The final details are contained within the Finance Bill and accompanying documentation.

Tania Bowers, General Counsel at agency body, APSCo, said:

Lobbying win
“While the draft legislation is pretty much as we expected in that it removes contractors from the scope of IR35 and makes this new legislation applicable instead, we are pleased that HMRC has, at least, taken on board APSCo’s lobbying arguments for a statutory obligation on the public sector client to make the determination to decide whether, if the worker was engaged directly s/he would be an employee for tax purposes, and that this information must notified to the intermediary. This is a really important point because in reality, for a recruitment firm to be able to start the process, they need to know how much they can pay the worker – and what models they can use.

“However, while HMRC has listened to APSCo, there is no time frame specified for the provision of this information. What the draft legislation does say is that the recruitment firm can request the determination if it is not received – and that the public sector client must provide it within 31 days. The recruitment firm can also raise queries on the decision but again the public sector client has 31 days to respond. The draft legislation does not pass the liability for the determination on to the public sector client unless they simply fail to provide the information after a request. The draft wording is in no way ideal but it does at least confirm the important underlying principle that the public sector client is the only party that can determine the status of an assignment.

“We believe that if in doubt, the vast majority of intermediaries will treat workers as deemed employees in order to mitigate risk and while contractors will be able to query decisions, this will inevitably lead to investigations dragging on which is far from ideal."

Outsourcing – some clarification
“There may be some good news for the resourcing of some of the larger infrastructure projects that the Chancellor has announced. We believe that the requirement for a chain payment for a worker’s services within the draft legislation could mean that consultancies providing outsourced services rather than a provision of a worker’s services, could be outside of the scope of the legislation. This may be supported by the wording of the Government’s response to the consultation which states the scope ‘is not intended to cover private companies performing public functions’.”

Gloomy outlook
“However, the overall picture is a gloomy one. The UK’s ability to prosper in a post Brexit world rests on our capability to source highly skilled experts – often on a short-term contract – and on a just in time basis. Whether these independent specialists will still be available once the new rules are in place – and what impact this will have on our economy remains to be seen.”


--
If you wish to comment on this article, please log in and use the Reply button below. Registering is free and easy - see 'Join Shout99'.
-
Susie Hughes © Shout99 2016

Printer Version

Mail this to a friend

Copyright 1999-2018, Shout99.com | All Rights Reserved
Privacy Notice and Terms of Use
 

Advertisements
advert
advert
advert
advert