Our website uses cookies to store information on your computer. You may delete and block all cookies from this site, but parts of the site will not work as a result. Find out more about how we use cookies.
(Accept cookies and do not show this message again)
Shout99 - News matters for freelancers
Search Shout99 - News matters for freelancers
(Advanced Search)
   Join Shout99  About Shout99   Sitemap   Contact Shout99 20th Apr 2024
Forgot your password?
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
New Users Click Here
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
Front Page
News...
Freelancers' Shop...
Ask an Expert...
Letters
Direct Contracts
Press Links
Question Time
The Clubhouse
Conference Hall...
News from Partners
Accountants

Login
Sitemap

Business Links

Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660

Freelancers' Shop

Personal Financial Services
from ContractorFinancials

Mortgages

Pensions

ISAs

Income protection

... and more special offers for Shout99 readers in the Freelancers' Shop

Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
  
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660

News for the
Construction Industry

Hardhatter.com - News for small businesses in the construction industry

Powered by
Powered by Novacaster
Advertisement
Cogent

Claim that new IR35 online tool is 'unlawful'
by Susie Hughes at 11:40 06/03/17 (News on IR35)
A trade association is challenging the legality of the online tool associated with the controversial public sector IR35 rules.
The Association of Recruitment Consultancies (ARC) says that its lawyers have formally written to HMRC about the proposed IR35 rules expected to apply from April 6 2017.

Adrian Marlowe, chairman of ARC, said: “Use of an online tool has always been claimed by HMRC as fundamental to the success of its new policy to require public sector hirers and agencies to assess IR35 and, where it applies, pay taxes on a PAYE basis.

“However as our public law specialist lawyers, Bindmans, have now said in their carefully argued letter, “reforms (to IR35), whilst the online tool remains flawed …. in the ways set out…, would either be unlawful or lead to unlawfulness.”

Advertisement
Against the background of continuing complaint from a wide range of interested parties, including public sector hirers, and a perceived failure by HMRC to address some fundamental legal issues, ARC has called on the Government to undertake not to implement the draft legislation until a proper and meaningful review has taken place to address concerns about the legality of the reforms.

Mr Marlowe said: “The process of consultation in respect of the use of an online tool has been deeply worrying. From the outset we have expressed concerns, as have many others, as to how the tool could work legally in practice given that HMRC says that it will stand by the result.

"The tool was always likely to be set up on a check list basis, a methodology repeatedly ruled by the courts as the wrong approach. With few checks and balances in place over the programming of the tool, amongst other things, there is a real risk of unfair prejudice.

“Also it has not helped that progress of the Government programme has been on a drip by drip basis over a long period. Less than one week before the budget, HMRC has said that it is still evolving the tool and may change the draft legislation. So with no clear and final position in sight, the Government appears determined to make hirers and agencies liable and use the tool regardless of the concerns.

“The fact that there should be IR35 reform is in no doubt, but the method used should not bring about the unlawfulness and problems that seem very apparent, as advised by our lawyers Bindmans.”

--
If you wish to comment on this article, please log in and use the Reply button below. Registering is free and easy - see 'Join Shout99'.
-
Susie Hughes © Shout99 2017

Printer Version

Mail this to a friend

Copyright 1999-2018, Shout99.com | All Rights Reserved
Privacy Notice and Terms of Use
 

Advertisements
advert
advert
advert
advert