Having appeared in front of one of Matthew Taylor’s panel sessions in March, IPSE has now submitted its official response to the review, in which is laid out steps the Government should take to ensure self-employment remains a positive and attractive way of working.
It says to help end the confusion about what does and does not constitute self-employment, a fundamental rethink of employment is necessary.
There are currently definitions in law for what it means to be an employee and what is means to be classified as a worker, but not for genuine self-employment. The definition should consider four key tenets:
- Having autonomy in their work. For freelancers this means the ability to send substitutes and for there to be no requirement to do work outside agreed work.
- Having control over working arrangements. Self-employed people are able to decide how to complete their tasks and the hours and location they choose to work in.
- Taking on business risk. Self-employed take responsibility for their finance and tax responsibilities and can be paid on a per task basis.
- Level of independence from clients. This would include things such as having to wear a uniform or using your own tools and equipment to complete your work.
IPSE believes the Taylor Review should also consider how the welfare system can be adapted in order to better support the self-employed, particularly relating to issues of Universal Credit and maternity and paternity provisions.
Better provisions, such as auto-enrolment, must be considered to allow the self-employed to better save for retirement. IPSE also called for the need to incentivise training and skill development and the importance of undertaking a strategic review of the tax system to ensure it is fairer, more efficient and more adaptable.
Simon McVicker, IPSE Director of Policy, said: “Whatever the outcome of the upcoming general election, self-employment will be a big issue for the next Government. It is imperative, therefore, that the review is able to identify where improvement and fairness is needed and make suggestions to achieve this.
“Too often the courts are relied on to determine employment status - it's costly, time-consuming and utterly exhausting. It's time for the policy makers to take responsibility. They need to develop a statutory definition for self-employment after a comprehensive consultation.
“A better welfare system is required, particularly with regards to maternity benefits, while pension provisions are still inadequate for the self-employed to effectively save for a comfortable retirement.
“The current tax system remains outdated, therefore the need to overhaul it with a more progressive and flexible system that fairly accommodates for those working in self-employment has become abundantly apparent.
“The self-employed add tremendous value and worth to the UK and we hope the new government will heed the review’s suggestions by rewarding them with the provisions they deserve and the support they need. There must be a fairer way, there must be an easier way, there must be a quicker way – and a statutory definition would achieve this.”
If you wish to comment on this article, please log in and use the Reply button below. Registering is free and easy - see 'Join Shout99'.
Susie Hughes © Shout99 2017