Our website uses cookies to store information on your computer. You may delete and block all cookies from this site, but parts of the site will not work as a result. Find out more about how we use cookies.
(Accept cookies and do not show this message again)
Shout99 - News matters for freelancers
Search Shout99 - News matters for freelancers
(Advanced Search)
   Join Shout99  About Shout99   Sitemap   Contact Shout99 29th Apr 2024
Forgot your password?
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
New Users Click Here
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
Front Page
News...
Freelancers' Shop...
Ask an Expert...
Letters
Direct Contracts
Press Links
Question Time
The Clubhouse
Conference Hall...
News from Partners
Accountants

Login
Sitemap

Business Links

Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660

Freelancers' Shop

Personal Financial Services
from ContractorFinancials

Mortgages

Pensions

ISAs

Income protection

... and more special offers for Shout99 readers in the Freelancers' Shop

Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
  
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660

News for the
Construction Industry

Hardhatter.com - News for small businesses in the construction industry

Powered by
Powered by Novacaster
Advertisement
Cogent

Agency group lambasts wilful disregard of IR35 report
by Susie Hughes at 11:07 11/11/15 (News on IR35)
Following reports in the national press from ‘Government sources’ warning of a major crackdown on Personal Services Companies (PSCs), agency group APSCo has spoken of a wilful disregard for the recommendations outlined in a report published by a House of Lords Select Committee set up to review the use of Personal Services Companies last year.
Government sources told the Daily Mail and Guardian that a new test forcing employers to become responsible for deciding how contractors should be treated for tax purposes will be announced in the Autumn Statement.(See: New idea for freelancer crackdown would cause 'untold damage' - Shout99, Nov 2015)

APSCo has also lambasted HMRC for disregarding the views of industry and representative groups within the IR35 Forum. It claims that they fail to consult on anything of significance, that it uses the group as a 'tick box exercise to make them look good' and decribes HMRC's bevaiour as 'appalling'.

Window dressing

Advertisement
Samantha Hurley, is Head of External Relations and Compliance at APSCo, and gave evidence to the Select committee. She is also a member of the IR35 Forum – a group of external stakeholders who meet regularly with HMRC to improve and evaluate the way IR35 legislation is applied.

She said: “One of the main recommendations that came out of the Select Committee was that HMRC should liaise more closely with the IR35 Forum to ensure that proper engagement with business and relevant stakeholders was taking place before any decisions were made.

“HMRC has NOT been liaising with the Forum in the way that they have been told to – and in the way that they told the House of Lords that they would. They have cancelled our next meeting and, as confirmed in a letter we have seen from David Gauke MP, Financial Secretary to the Treasury, have made decisions around an online digital service apparently to ‘help IR35 customers work out whether the rules apply to them.’

"While this was mentioned in passing at a recent meeting as an idea, there has been no real discussion or consultation. It is patently clear that HMRC sees the Forum as nothing more than window dressing – a tick box exercise to make them look good when in fact if there are any decisions to be made they simply close ranks and cease to engage. It is truly appalling behaviour.

“We have already seen how disastrous the now defunct (at our recommendation) Business Entity Tests were in determining whether IR35 applied and without any consultation with the business community, this tool is destined to go the same way. It is also very interesting that the letter was sent just five days after the deadline for responses to HMRC’s so called ‘discussion document’ consultation around IR35 proposals which tends to suggests to me that they have already made their mind up and have simply run roughshod over any attempt at a proper consultation process.

"APSCo will be writing in the strongest possible terms to the House of Lords Liaison Committee to inform them of this wilful disregard.”

See also: Lords PSC Report: Summary and recommendations - Shout99, April 2014)

--
If you wish to comment on this article, please log in and use the Reply button below. Registering is free and easy - see 'Join Shout99'.
-
Susie Hughes © Shout99 2015

Printer Version

Mail this to a friend

Copyright 1999-2018, Shout99.com | All Rights Reserved
Privacy Notice and Terms of Use
 

Advertisements
advert
advert
advert
advert