Our website uses cookies to store information on your computer. You may delete and block all cookies from this site, but parts of the site will not work as a result. Find out more about how we use cookies.
(Accept cookies and do not show this message again)
Shout99 - News matters for freelancers
Search Shout99 - News matters for freelancers
(Advanced Search)
   Join Shout99  About Shout99   Sitemap   Contact Shout99 26th Apr 2024
Forgot your password?
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
New Users Click Here
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
Front Page
News...
Freelancers' Shop...
Ask an Expert...
Letters
Direct Contracts
Press Links
Question Time
The Clubhouse
Conference Hall...
News from Partners
Accountants

Login
Sitemap

Business Links

Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660

Freelancers' Shop

Personal Financial Services
from ContractorFinancials

Mortgages

Pensions

ISAs

Income protection

... and more special offers for Shout99 readers in the Freelancers' Shop

Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
  
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660

News for the
Construction Industry

Hardhatter.com - News for small businesses in the construction industry

Powered by
Powered by Novacaster
Advertisement
Cogent

OTS adds its voice to criticism of 'off-payroll' proposals
by Susie Hughes at 12:06 08/09/16 (News on IR35)
The Government proposals to clamp down on so-called off-payroll working in the public sector have received a set-back after criticism from within its own ranks, the Office of Tax Simplification (OTS).
Advertisement
The OTS was set up as an independent office within the Treasury structure with a focus of providing technical and administrative simplification of the tax system. An important component of the latter is delivering certainty.

However, in its response to the Government's consultation on the controversial proposals for freelancer or 'off-payroll workers', the OTS said that it has concerns that it will not deliver simplification.

It says that aspects of the proposals introduce additional complexity, for example:

  • the need to request information to help determine status, which will add administration;
  • the status test results may not be binding, and so lack certainty;
  • there are possible boundary issues and market distortions between private and public sector.

The Government's consultation also mentions the use of a new digital tool, along the lines of an enhanced Employment Status Indicator, which had [previously been suggested by OTS. While the OTS supported the idea it cautions that:

  • such a tool will only deliver simplification if there are clear rules and procedures around gaining certainty for the outcome;
  • it will naturally need testing in practice but that testing should consider whether, as the OTS suggested, it might be better to have two versions of the ESI to cater for differing situations/businesses;
  • the tool will also need to be kept up to date.
  • The Government proposals placed an additional burden on agencies, end clients in the public sector or other third parties engaged in hiring 'personal service companies' to determine their employment and therefore tax status.

    There has been widespread criticism of the proposals.

    The OTS response can be viewed here.

    HMRC's public consultation: 'Off-payroll working in the public sector: reform of the intermediaries legislation' .

    --
    If you wish to comment on this article, please log in and use the Reply button below. Registering is free and easy - see 'Join Shout99'.
    -
    Susie Hughes © Shout99 2016

    View Comments (Flat Mode) Printer Version

    Mail this to a friend
    OTS adds its voice to criticis... Susie Hughes - 8/09
        Re: OTS adds its voice to crit... DavidHazel - 20/09
        Re: OTS adds its voice to crit... rookwood - 22/09

    Copyright 1999-2018, Shout99.com | All Rights Reserved
    Privacy Notice and Terms of Use
     

    Advertisements
    advert
    advert
    advert
    advert