Our website uses cookies to store information on your computer. You may delete and block all cookies from this site, but parts of the site will not work as a result. Find out more about how we use cookies.
(Do not show this message again)
Shout99 - News matters for freelancers
Search Shout99 - News matters for freelancers
(Advanced Search)
   Join Shout99  About Shout99   Sitemap   Contact Shout99 4th Jul 2020
Forgot your password?
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
New Users Click Here
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
Front Page
Freelancers' Shop...
Ask an Expert...
Direct Contracts
Press Links
Question Time
The Clubhouse
Conference Hall...
News from Partners


Business Links

Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660

Freelancers' Shop

Personal Financial Services
from ContractorFinancials




Income protection

... and more special offers for Shout99 readers in the Freelancers' Shop

Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660

News for the
Construction Industry

Hardhatter.com - News for small businesses in the construction industry

Powered by
Powered by Novacaster

HMRC wins IR35 tribunal case against BBC presenters
by Susie Hughes at 09:41 19/09/19 (News on IR35)
HMRC has won an IR35 Tribunal case against three BBC journalists.
The Tribunal also found that the journalists, Joanna Gosling, David Eades and Tim Willcox, were ‘forced’ into working as 'self-employed' by the Corporation.

The three journalists were pursued by HMRC for £920,000 as part of a crackdown on the use of personal service companies.

The judges found that the 'imbalance of bargaining power' at the BBC was a significant factor in the case, stating that 'the BBC were in a unique position and used it to force the presenters into contracting through personal service companies and to accept reductions in pay."

The BBC has said that 'it wants to help presenters resolve any historic tax issues they face because of the way their employment status is now being assessed'.

In a split Tribunal decision, the court ruled that 'the assumed relationships were ones of employment' as the BBC told the presenters how, where and when to work.

The outcome will come as a blow for more than 100 other presenters in a similar situation who had seen this as a test case.

Qdos CEO, Seb Maley, said: “It’s of real concern that at present, these individuals look like they will be made to pay vast sums to HMRC, despite the judges finding they were ‘forced’ into working as self-employed by the BBC. The onus should be on the engager to settle, not the presenters, who it's very difficult to label as guilty.

“With around 100 other BBC presenters in the same boat, we could see similar verdicts in time. However, each case needs to be examined on its own merit. And if it’s decided The BBC left someone with no choice but to work outside IR35, then these individuals must be helped financially.

“Bear in mind that the BBC example is a rare one and isn’t reflective of a typical contractor engagement. Therefore, albeit worrying, genuinely self-employed contractors who have set or had their status set with care, do not need to panic.

“With further IR35 reform approaching, companies engaging contractors should take note. No firm should force individuals into a working arrangement purely for its own benefit. IR35 status must be assessed fairly. In doing so, situations like this will be avoided.”

Further IR35 information
For more information about all aspects of IR35, including the controversial IR35 reforms see Shout99's News on IR35 section.

If you wish to comment on this article, please log in and use the Reply button below. Registering is free and easy - see 'Join Shout99'.
Susie Hughes © Shout99 2019

Printer Version

Mail this to a friend

Copyright 1999-2018, Shout99.com | All Rights Reserved
Privacy Notice and Terms of Use