Our website uses cookies to store information on your computer. You may delete and block all cookies from this site, but parts of the site will not work as a result. Find out more about how we use cookies.
(Accept cookies and do not show this message again)
Shout99 - News matters for freelancers
Search Shout99 - News matters for freelancers
(Advanced Search)
   Join Shout99  About Shout99   Sitemap   Contact Shout99 26th Apr 2024
Forgot your password?
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
New Users Click Here
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
Front Page
News...
Freelancers' Shop...
Ask an Expert...
Letters
Direct Contracts
Press Links
Question Time
The Clubhouse
Conference Hall...
News from Partners
Accountants

Login
Sitemap

Business Links

Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660

Freelancers' Shop

Personal Financial Services
from ContractorFinancials

Mortgages

Pensions

ISAs

Income protection

... and more special offers for Shout99 readers in the Freelancers' Shop

Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
  
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660

News for the
Construction Industry

Hardhatter.com - News for small businesses in the construction industry

Powered by
Powered by Novacaster
Advertisement
Cogent

Lawyers drive 'coach and horses' through IR scheme
by Susie Hughes at 08:41 24/09/04 (News on Business)
The new scheme to make advisers disclose details of tax avoidance schemes is set to fail after the Law Society advised solicitors that they may not need to comply in many cases.
The Law Society issued guidance advising that a solicitor who disclosed information about tax avoidance schemes under the new Inland Revenue regime was "likely to be disclosing the substance of privileged communications passing between him and his client for the purpose of obtaining legal advice".

The legal profession is claiming legal professional privilege and as a result, believe they will not be covered by the new disclosure rules in many cases and would not, therefore, have to inform the Revenue about their clients' tax arrangements.

It is reported that the government did not intend for lawyers to enjoy a special position and is now considering amending the legislation to override the Law Society guidance. Meanwhile, the Law Society and the Inland Revenue have failed to reach agreement on this point.

Coach and horses
Not surprisingly, this has infuriated accountants and advisers who cannot claim the same privilege and have already been highly critical of the rules which force them to disclose information about the arrangements they make with their clients.

Aidan O'Carroll, Head of Tax at Ernst & Young said: "The new regime calling for early disclosure of tax schemes is now set to fail. "The Law Society's advice that complying with tax shelter disclosure rules breaches legal professional privilege runs a coach and horses through the tax avoidance disclosure regime.

"The entire tax avoidance industry will simply move to the lawyers and the policy objectives of this new early disclosure regime will be defeated unless the Government takes decisive action quickly.

"It is completely unacceptable that the application of the regime depends upon whether tax advisers are practising as part of a law firm or as part of an accounting or other firm. This is both irrational and anti-competitive. The start of the regime should be deferred until there is a level playing field".

--
If you wish to comment on this article, please log in and use the Reply button below. Registering is free and easy - see 'Join Shout99'.
-
Susie Hughes © Shout99.com 2004

View Comments (Flat Mode) Printer Version

Mail this to a friend
Lawyers drive 'coach and horse... Susie Hughes - 24/09
    Lawyers Gaining an Advantage? richard-s - 24/09
    Re: Lawyers drive 'coach and h... brianc - 25/09
       Re: Lawyers drive 'coach and h... radsoft - 25/09
          Re: Lawyers drive 'coach and h... nickjoy - 25/09
             Re: Lawyers drive 'coach and h... radsoft - 25/09
                Re: Lawyers drive 'coach and h... anthonyenglish - 26/09
                   Re: Lawyers drive 'coach and h... Navaron - 27/09
                      Re: Lawyers drive 'coach and h... radsoft - 27/09
                         Re: Lawyers drive 'coach and h... Navaron - 27/09
                            Re: Lawyers drive 'coach and h... radsoft - 27/09
                               Re: Lawyers drive 'coach and h... Navaron - 27/09
                                  Re: Lawyers drive 'coach and h... radsoft - 27/09
                Re: Lawyers drive 'coach and h... nickjoy - 27/09
                   Re: Lawyers drive 'coach and h... radsoft - 27/09
                      Re: Lawyers drive 'coach and h... stillington - 27/09
                         Re: Lawyers drive 'coach and h... radsoft - 27/09
                            Re: Lawyers drive 'coach and h... stillington - 27/09
                               Re: Lawyers drive 'coach and h... radsoft - 27/09
                                  Re: Lawyers drive 'coach and h... stillington - 27/09
                                     Re: Lawyers drive 'coach and h... radsoft - 27/09
                                        Re: Lawyers drive 'coach and h... stillington - 27/09
                            Re: Lawyers drive 'coach and h... snodgrasse - 27/09
                   Re: Lawyers drive 'coach and h... Navaron - 27/09
                Re: Lawyers drive 'coach and h... anthonyenglish - 27/09
             Re: Lawyers drive 'coach and h... Navaron - 27/09
    The point of this was alanp - 27/09
       Re: The point of this was Navaron - 27/09
          Re: The point of this was alanp - 27/09
             Re: The point of this was Navaron - 27/09
                Re: The point of this was stillington - 27/09
                   Re: The point of this was Navaron - 27/09
                      Re: The point of this was stillington - 27/09
                         Re: The point of this was alanp - 27/09
                            And neatly sliding into a diff... stillington - 27/09
                               Re: And neatly sliding into a ... alanp - 27/09
                   Re: The point of this was nickjoy - 28/09
                      Re: The point of this was stillington - 28/09
                         Re: The point of this was radsoft - 28/09
                            Re: The point of this was stillington - 28/09
                               Re: The point of this was snodgrasse - 28/09
                               Re: The point of this was radsoft - 28/09
                                  Re: The point of this was anthonyenglish - 28/09
                                     Re: The point of this was radsoft - 28/09
                                        Re: The point of this was stillington - 29/09
                                           Re: The point of this was radsoft - 29/09
                                              Re: The point of this was stillington - 29/09
                                                 Re: The point of this was radsoft - 29/09
                                                    Re: The point of this was stillington - 29/09
                                                       Re: The point of this was radsoft - 29/09
                                                 Re: The point of this was radsoft - 29/09
                                                    Re: The point of this was stillington - 29/09
                                                       Re: The point of this was radsoft - 29/09
                                     Re: The point of this was radsoft - 4/10
                               Counterpoint ..... radsoft - 29/09
                                  Re: Counterpoint ..... chothers - 30/09
                                     Re: Counterpoint ..... radsoft - 3/10
                                  Re: Counterpoint ..... stillington - 30/09
                                     Re: Counterpoint ..... radsoft - 3/10
                                        Re: Counterpoint ..... stillington - 3/10
                                           Re: Counterpoint ..... radsoft - 3/10
                                              Re: Counterpoint ..... stillington - 3/10

Copyright 1999-2018, Shout99.com | All Rights Reserved
Privacy Notice and Terms of Use
 

Advertisements
advert
advert
advert
advert