Our website uses cookies to store information on your computer. You may delete and block all cookies from this site, but parts of the site will not work as a result. Find out more about how we use cookies.
(Accept cookies and do not show this message again)
Shout99 - News matters for freelancers
Search Shout99 - News matters for freelancers
(Advanced Search)
   Join Shout99  About Shout99   Sitemap   Contact Shout99 11th Oct 2024
Forgot your password?
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
New Users Click Here
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660

Follow Shout99 on X

Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
Front Page
News...
  Business
  IR35
  Political
  Income shifting/S660
  Viewpoint
  IR591
  Agents
  Newsletters
  Shout99 calls
  Links
Freelancers' Shop...
Ask an Expert...
Letters
Direct Contracts
Press Links
Question Time
The Clubhouse
Conference Hall...
News from Partners
Accountants

Login
Sitemap

Business Links

Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
  
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
Powered by
Powered by Novacaster
Welcome for Government decisions on agency regulation
by Susie Hughes at 11:46 18/07/13 (News on Agents)
The Association of Recruitment Consultancies (ARC) has applauded the Government for what it described as a considered approach on the consultation on reforming the regulatory framework for the recruitment sector.
Last week, we explained how the Government had reacted to views to change the regulation of agencies. There had been some concerns that they would move to a more self-regulatory framework. (See: Government acts on reforming recruitment industry Shout99, July 2013)

Constructive
Adrian Marlowe, chairman of ARC, said: "The Government has set about change in a constructive and balanced way. Although the consultation itself raised some real fears that wholesale change was inevitable, with some potential significant negatives, the response indicates that those confusing areas that need addressing are to be tidied up and those that have underpinned stability and security for workers as well as standards, are to be retained, with a likelihood that they may be improved for the benefit of the industry as a whole.

“We are therefore pleased with the outcome so far. Ideas, such as the proposal to switch enforcement of breaches of regulations to the employment tribunal, a key point which ARC had strongly lobbied against, appear to have been rejected.

"At the same time arguments that ARC had proposed relating to payment arrangements for workers where there are various businesses involved in the chain of supply, such as vendors and RPOs, are under consideration."

Opted-out
ARC suggested that analysis indicated that the Government has rejected the idea that contractors should automatically be opted out of scope. Instead, company workers will continue to have the ability to opt out as now and enforcement of payment infringements for lower paid workers will be transferred to HMRC.

Advertisement
In addition the idea that agencies should be able to charge fees for providing work finding services has also been rejected.

However, removal of job boards from the scope of the regulations and restrictions on enforcement of transfer fees are still on the agenda, leaving open questions as to how these will be dealt with.

Mr Marlowe concluded: "As always the wording of new legislation, including any relating to transfer fees and payment arrangements, will be crucial in determining the end result. Overall, as things stand, key points of principle appear now to be in place, in our view producing a good balance, and this can only serve to strengthen and support the industry."

--
If you wish to comment on this article, please log in and use the Reply button below. Registering is free and easy - see 'Join Shout99'.
-
Susie Hughes © Shout99 2013

Printer Version
Mail this to a friend
 
Copyright 1999-2018, Shout99.com | All Rights Reserved
Privacy Notice and Terms of Use