Our website uses cookies to store information on your computer. You may delete and block all cookies from this site, but parts of the site will not work as a result. Find out more about how we use cookies.
(Do not show this message again)
Shout99 - News matters for freelancers
Search Shout99 - News matters for freelancers
(Advanced Search)
   Join Shout99  About Shout99   Sitemap   Contact Shout99 26th May 2018
Forgot your password?
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
New Users Click Here
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
Front Page
Freelancers' Shop...
Ask an Expert...
Direct Contracts
Press Links
Question Time
The Clubhouse
Conference Hall...
News from Partners


Business Links

Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660

Freelancers' Shop

Personal Financial Services
from ContractorFinancials




Income protection

... and more special offers for Shout99 readers in the Freelancers' Shop

Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660

News for the
Construction Industry

Hardhatter.com - News for small businesses in the construction industry

Powered by
Powered by Novacaster

Contractor 'witch hunt' threatens success of NHS projects
by Susie Hughes at 13:22 28/05/14 (News on Business)
The on-going row about public sector workers using so-called personal service companies has erupted again after senior NHS workers have been found to be operating as freelancers.
The issue originally came to light when senior public sector workers, including head of Student Loans Company, Ed Lester, were found to be operating through their own companies while working full-time and exclusively for a Government department or quango.

The resulting media furore led to the Government clamping down on this practice, amid concerns that legitimate freelancers might be caught in the knee-jerking reaction. The Cabinet Office put all Government Departments on notice to put their house in order and issued strict criteria for engaging freelancers or workers 'off-payroll'. (See: HMRC's business tests at heart of new rules for contractors - Shout99, Sept 2012)

Now the problem has boiled over again after media reports that more than 2,400 NHS workers, mainly bureuacrats, are being paid as contractors rather than receiving their salary directly from the public purse. It is also indicated that this could be the tip of the iceberg as only staff who earn more than Ł58,000 a year and have been employees for at least six months were investigated.

Freelancer group, the PCG moved to clarify the situation before, it claimed, vital NHS projects were put in jeopardy.

Chris Bryce, PCG’s CEO said: “Board members should be on payroll and there is no excuse for them not being so. However, to suggest every person operating under a Personal Service Company for more than six months is doing so illegitimately shows a fundamental lack of understanding of how projects are delivered to large organisations.

“The NHS is a huge and complex organisation and delivering important projects, on which lives depend, takes time. Often much longer than the arbitrary limit of six months I have seen bandied about in the media.”

The group also tried to clarify the situation when it comes to the amount of tax paid by people working as independent professionals and using a Personal Service Company.

Mr Bryce said: “As a business, Personal Service Companies pay corporation tax, which is set at 20 per cent. However, when the individual running that company draws their income down they are subject to further tax, just like any employee or shareholder would be.

“To suggest Personal Service Companies enjoy preferential treatment over any other business when it comes to paying their fair share of tax is quite frankly, rubbish.

“Independent professionals choose to deliver work to their clients through a Personal Service Company for the same reasons as any business large or small. It safeguards them from personal liability should anything go wrong.

“Delivering critical projects to a body like the NHS without that protection leaves the individual open to personal liability. You wouldn’t expect any other supplier to take this responsibility and it is unfair to do so of an independent professional.”

If you wish to comment on this article, please log in and use the Reply button below. Registering is free and easy - see 'Join Shout99'.
Susie Hughes © Shout99 2014

View Comments (Flat Mode) Printer Version

Mail this to a friend
Contractor 'witch hunt' threat... Susie Hughes - 28/05
    Re: Contractor 'witch hunt' th... roger_pearse - 29/05

Copyright 1999-2018, Shout99.com | All Rights Reserved
Privacy Notice and Terms of Use