Our website uses cookies to store information on your computer. You may delete and block all cookies from this site, but parts of the site will not work as a result. Find out more about how we use cookies.
(Accept cookies and do not show this message again)
Shout99 - News matters for freelancers
Search Shout99 - News matters for freelancers
(Advanced Search)
   Join Shout99  About Shout99   Sitemap   Contact Shout99 26th Apr 2024
Forgot your password?
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
New Users Click Here
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
Front Page
News...
Freelancers' Shop...
Ask an Expert...
Letters
Direct Contracts
Press Links
Question Time
The Clubhouse
Conference Hall...
News from Partners
Accountants

Login
Sitemap

Business Links

Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660

Freelancers' Shop

Personal Financial Services
from ContractorFinancials

Mortgages

Pensions

ISAs

Income protection

... and more special offers for Shout99 readers in the Freelancers' Shop

Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
  
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660

News for the
Construction Industry

Hardhatter.com - News for small businesses in the construction industry

Powered by
Powered by Novacaster
Advertisement
Cogent

HMRC strains to issue penalties correctly
by Susie Hughes at 10:59 21/12/16 (News on Business)
More than 4,000 accelerated payment notices (APNs) have been withdrawn by HMRC as the tax authority struggles to use its most powerful weapon correctly according to an accountancy firm.
Moore Stephens says that this means one in 14 of the 60,000 APNs HMRC has so far issued has been in error.

  • One in 14 APNs issued in error
  • Concerns over resource available to HMRC Counter Avoidance Directorate

APNs were controversially first introduced in 2014. They were intended to combat what HMRC sees as ‘abusive’ tax avoidance and enables HMRC to request full upfront payment of disputed tax within 90 days, without the right of appeal.

Moore Stephens says that the number of APNs issued in error calls into question the level of resource available to HMRC’s Counter Avoidance Directorate – the team within the tax authority that investigates suspected tax avoidance and issues APNs.

HMRC has assured Ministers that the Directorate will have access to the resource it needs to resolve legacy tax avoidance cases.

Advertisement
Moore Stephens advised that any taxpayer who receives an APN should not simply take it at face value. Given that HMRC has made errors in issuing APNs, it is important to take expert advice before paying what is often a very substantial sum to HMRC.

Judicial review proceedings have forced HMRC to withdraw APNs as it was found that the schemes were not subject to the Disclosure Of Tax Avoidance Schemes (DOTAS) regulations – non-DOTAS scheme members are not liable for APNs.

Use with care
Dominic Arnold, Head of Tax Investigations and Disputes at Moore Stephens, said: “HMRC risks falling into a ‘shoot first, ask questions later’ approach with APNs.

“APNs are HMRC’s weapons of mass destruction so they need to be used with care.

“Taxpayers receiving APNs shouldn’t automatically accept that they should have been issued or the amount demanded are accurate – HMRC’s track record in this area is not perfect. Getting expert advice is essential, as there are hundreds of thousands of pounds at stake in some cases.

“It’s critical that the Counter Avoidance Directorate gets the right number of staff with the right level of seniority and experience to keep errors to a minimum.”

--
If you wish to comment on this article, please log in and use the Reply button below. Registering is free and easy - see 'Join Shout99'.
-
Susie Hughes © Shout99 2016

Printer Version

Mail this to a friend

Copyright 1999-2018, Shout99.com | All Rights Reserved
Privacy Notice and Terms of Use
 

Advertisements
advert
advert
advert
advert