Our website uses cookies to store information on your computer. You may delete and block all cookies from this site, but parts of the site will not work as a result. Find out more about how we use cookies.
(Accept cookies and do not show this message again)
Shout99 - News matters for freelancers
Search Shout99 - News matters for freelancers
(Advanced Search)
   Join Shout99  About Shout99   Sitemap   Contact Shout99 13th Jul 2024
Forgot your password?
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
New Users Click Here
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
Front Page
Freelancers' Shop...
Ask an Expert...
Direct Contracts
Press Links
Question Time
The Clubhouse
Conference Hall...
News from Partners


Business Links

Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660

Freelancers' Shop

Personal Financial Services
from ContractorFinancials




Income protection

... and more special offers for Shout99 readers in the Freelancers' Shop

Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660
Shout99 - Freelancers, FO35, Section 660

News for the
Construction Industry

Hardhatter.com - News for small businesses in the construction industry

Powered by
Powered by Novacaster

TUC and REC call for rethink on 'ill-judged' strike proposals
by Susie Hughes at 16:37 14/02/24 (News on Business)
Representatives of both the agency sector and the trade unions have urged the Government to abandon rehashed plan to allow agency staff to replace employees who are on strike.
Trade union group, the TUC, and the Recruitment and Employment Confederation (REC) say this plan is counter-productive, impractical and could prolong and inflame disputes

High Court
In June 2023, the Government was defeated in the High Court after it rushed through new laws that allowed agencies to supply employers with workers to fill in for those on strike.

The presiding judge criticised Ministers for acting in a way that was “unfair, unlawful and irrational” and reinstated the ban on agency staff being used to break strikes.

But despite this rebuke – and strong opposition from employers and unions – Ministers are resurrecting the plans.

Prolonged disputes
The joint statement from REC and the TUC warns the change could prolong disputes: “We both believe that using agency staff to cover strikes only prolongs and inflames the conflict between employers and their permanent staff.

“It also risks placing agency staff and recruitment businesses in the centre of often complicated and contentious disputes over which they have no control.

“Where a dispute occurs, the focus should instead be on negotiation and resolution to return to a normal service.”

It also says the proposal is 'impractical': “The proposal is simply impractical. There are currently significant numbers of vacancies for temporary agency workers. This suggests that many can pick and choose the jobs they take and are unlikely to opt for roles that require them to undermine industrial action.

"Meanwhile, many roles that may be on strike require technical skills or training and impractical to fill with agency workers at very short notice.

"And it highlights the failure of Government to provide any robust evidence that the changes will benefit employers."

Neil Carberry, Chief Executive of the REC, said: “Agencies across the country have been clear that they do not want the law changed again.

“The ban on direct replacement of striking workers reflects global good practice and protects temps and agencies from being drawn into disputes that are nothing to do with them.

“Removal of the ban does nothing to resolve those disputes either. The REC was clear in 2022 that this is a step which only causes problems for businesses and workers in reality – however good politicians think it sounds.”

TUC General Secretary Paul Nowak said: "The humiliating High Court defeat should have been the final nail in the coffin for these unworkable, shoddy plans to overturn the long-standing ban on agency workers filling in for striking workers.

“Now they are trying to resurrect the proposal despite strong opposition from unions and employers.

“It’s spiteful, cynical – and it won’t work.

“Bringing in agency staff to deliver important services in place of strikers risks worsening disputes and poisoning industrial relations.

“Agency recruitment bodies have repeatedly made clear they don’t want their staff to be put in the position where they have to cover strikes.

“It’s time for Ministers to listen and drop these plans for good.”

If you wish to comment on this article, please log in and use the Reply button below. Registering is free and easy - see 'Join Shout99'.
Susie Hughes © Shout99 2024

Printer Version

Mail this to a friend

Copyright 1999-2018, Shout99.com | All Rights Reserved
Privacy Notice and Terms of Use